2020
DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.1160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object focus marking in Spanish: An investigation using three tasks

Abstract: The literature on focus in Spanish contains a divide between theoretical claims and quantitative empirical evidence: While Spanish is often regarded as resorting to syntactic movement to mark focus, quantitative and/or experimental data often do not support this claim. Research focusing on non-final objects within the VP can provide valuable clarity to the empirical picture, especially when evidence is gathered using multiple methods, a practice known as triangulation. In this article, we use three different t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, it is worth noting the lack of apparent task effects. That is, we observe convergence on the more metalinguistic FCT and the less metalinguistic SPR task, and we have previously observed similar convergence on other judgment tasks (Hoot, 2017) and with production tasks (Hoot et al, 2020; Leal et al, 2018). Although we recognize that task effects may well modulate our interpretation of the extant data, in the case of focus in Spanish there is remarkable consistency across task type that supports the conclusion that this phenomenon is largely resilient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, it is worth noting the lack of apparent task effects. That is, we observe convergence on the more metalinguistic FCT and the less metalinguistic SPR task, and we have previously observed similar convergence on other judgment tasks (Hoot, 2017) and with production tasks (Hoot et al, 2020; Leal et al, 2018). Although we recognize that task effects may well modulate our interpretation of the extant data, in the case of focus in Spanish there is remarkable consistency across task type that supports the conclusion that this phenomenon is largely resilient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Evidence from monolingual speakers supports the view that focus realizations are variable. In Spanish, monolingual speakers accept and produce multiple word orders to realize focus on subjects and objects (Hoot, 2016; Hoot et al, 2020; Hoot & Leal, 2020; Leal et al, 2018). Given the input’s variability, heritage speakers may acquire constructions that meet their communicative needs without acquiring the full range of possibilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%