Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2011.2162635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object Discrimination With an Artificial Hand Using Electrical Stimulation of Peripheral Tactile and Proprioceptive Pathways With Intrafascicular Electrodes

Abstract: Trans-radial amputee subjects were implanted with intrafascicular electrodes in the stumps of the median and ulnar nerves. Electrical stimulation through these electrodes was used to provide sensations of touch and finger position referred to the amputated hand. Two subjects were asked to identify different objects as to size and stiffness by manipulating them with a myo-electric hand without visual or auditory cues. Both subjects were provided with information about contact force with the objects via tactile … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
163
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
163
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Feedback for prosthetic hands has traditionally been provided in a continuous fashion and with limited success, whether at body sites normally not involved in the motor task (Mann and Reimers 1970;Chatterjee et al 2008;Cipriani et al 2008;Saunders and Vijayakumar 2011;Stepp et al 2012) or by interfacing directly to neural structures normally involved in the control (i.e., afferent nerve fibers; Dhillon and Horch 2005;Rossini et al 2010;Horch et al 2011). For instance, Saunders and Vijayakumar (2011) provided continuous vibrotactile feedback related to grip force of a robot hand in an experimental setup similar to ours but failed to demonstrate any improved performance above that observed with visual feedback alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback for prosthetic hands has traditionally been provided in a continuous fashion and with limited success, whether at body sites normally not involved in the motor task (Mann and Reimers 1970;Chatterjee et al 2008;Cipriani et al 2008;Saunders and Vijayakumar 2011;Stepp et al 2012) or by interfacing directly to neural structures normally involved in the control (i.e., afferent nerve fibers; Dhillon and Horch 2005;Rossini et al 2010;Horch et al 2011). For instance, Saunders and Vijayakumar (2011) provided continuous vibrotactile feedback related to grip force of a robot hand in an experimental setup similar to ours but failed to demonstrate any improved performance above that observed with visual feedback alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, intraneural peripheral electrodes have enabled some degree of specificity in the recruitment of peripheral nerve afferents ( Fig. 1F) (53,54). This technology has also been used to design neural interfaces in which grip information was decoded from electrical activity of forearm muscles [electromyography (EMG)] (Fig.…”
Section: Plugging Into the Peripheral Nervous Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He correctly identified the objects' size and softness more than twice as often as would have been expected by chance 5 . Information about force and finger position was delivered from the prosthetic to a computer, which prompted stimulation of electrodes implanted in his upper-arm nerves.…”
Section: Alternative Sensesmentioning
confidence: 64%