2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20904-3_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object Detection and Terrain Classification in Agricultural Fields Using 3D Lidar Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ensures high resolution at short distance and prevents noisy features at far distance. We use the method from Kragh, Jørgensen and Pedersen () which in Kragh () has shown to outperform the generalized 3D feature descriptor fast point feature histograms (FPFH) (Rusu, Blodow, & Beetz, ) for sparse, lidar‐acquired point clouds. The method scales the neighborhood size linearly with the sensor distance.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This ensures high resolution at short distance and prevents noisy features at far distance. We use the method from Kragh, Jørgensen and Pedersen () which in Kragh () has shown to outperform the generalized 3D feature descriptor fast point feature histograms (FPFH) (Rusu, Blodow, & Beetz, ) for sparse, lidar‐acquired point clouds. The method scales the neighborhood size linearly with the sensor distance.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transformation makes the resulting point cloud have an approximately vertically oriented z‐axis. Using the adaptive neighborhood, nine features related to height, shape, and orientation are then calculated for each point (Kragh et al, ). f1f4 are height features.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It further assigns probability estimates (Wu et al, 2004) to each class to describe the certainty of each classification. The SVM classifier was trained on the same data used in Kragh et al (2015).…”
Section: Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chehata et al [2] used Random Forests trained on 21 features to classify 3D point clouds into 5 classes. Kragh et al utilized the SVM classifier with 13 features to classify point clouds [11]. Lafarge and Mallet distinguished four classes of interest, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%