2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object-based target search using remotely sensed data: A case study in detecting invasive exotic Australian Pine in south Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Object-based results look smoother and show an overall better matching to the land cover types expected from visual image interpretation. The salt-and-pepper effect was clearly alleviated by object-based classification compared to the pixel-based results; this shows consistency with most research comparing the two approaches (Blaschke, 2010;Lillesand, Kiefer, & Chipman, 2014;Xie, Roberts, & Johnson, 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Object-based results look smoother and show an overall better matching to the land cover types expected from visual image interpretation. The salt-and-pepper effect was clearly alleviated by object-based classification compared to the pixel-based results; this shows consistency with most research comparing the two approaches (Blaschke, 2010;Lillesand, Kiefer, & Chipman, 2014;Xie, Roberts, & Johnson, 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…For instance, Yu et al (2006) created a comprehensive vegetation inventory for a study area in Northern California and could empirically demonstrate that the OBIA approach overcame the problem of salt-and-pepper effects found in classification results from traditional per pixel approaches. (Xie et al, 2008) used an object based geographic image retrieval approach for detecting invasive, exotic Australian Pine in South Florida, USA. Dorren et al (2003) as well as Heyman et al (2003) favoured an OBIA approach to discriminate broadscale forest cover types, and in a subsequent study Maier et al (2008) incorporated very detailed information from LiDAR-derived canopy surface models.…”
Section: Obia Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-scale/multi-level GEOBIA (MS-GEOBIA) approaches, which incorporate multiple segmentations of an image at different "scale" levels for LULC classification (i.e., different average segment sizes), often outperform single-scale/single-level GEOBIA (SS-GEOBIA) approaches when LULC features of interest differ in size and/or texture [8][9][10][11], as even a very accurate single-level segmentation will likely split some LULC features into multiple segments (i.e., oversegment) and/or group them together with other neighboring LULC features in a single segment (i.e., undersegment). Many MS-GEOBIA studies involve classifying different LULC types at each segmentation level [8,[12][13][14][15], while few have compared SS-GEOBIA and MS-GEOBIA approaches for classifying a single LULC type of interest [16]. Residential areas vary in terms of both size (area of residential development) and texture (e.g., building sizes and building densities which vary by development), so a MS-GEOBIA approach may be more appropriate than SS-GEOBIA for mapping them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%