2013
DOI: 10.1167/13.10.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object-based encoding in visual working memory: A life span study

Abstract: Recent studies on development of visual working memory (VWM) predominantly focus on VWM capacity and spatial-based information filtering in VWM. Here we explored another new aspect of VWM development: object-based encoding (OBE), which refers to the fact that even if one feature dimension is required to be selected into VWM, the other irrelevant dimensions are also extracted. We explored the OBE in children, young adults, and old adults, by probing an "irrelevant-change distracting effect" in which a change of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the current study aimed at elucidating whether the irrelevant element could be extracted to WM and the potential index reflecting this modulation could be different under different experimental conditions (see footnote 1), it was important to avoid reaching a null result due to insensitive indexes. To this end, we followed previous studies (e.g., Ding et al, 2015;Ecker et al, 2013;Kirmsse, Zimmer, & Ecker, 2018;Zhang, Shen, Tang, Zhao, & Gao, 2013), recording and analyzing both the response accuracy and RT (see Table 1 for the descriptive statistics of the current study). For the RT, only trials with correct responses were entered into further analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the current study aimed at elucidating whether the irrelevant element could be extracted to WM and the potential index reflecting this modulation could be different under different experimental conditions (see footnote 1), it was important to avoid reaching a null result due to insensitive indexes. To this end, we followed previous studies (e.g., Ding et al, 2015;Ecker et al, 2013;Kirmsse, Zimmer, & Ecker, 2018;Zhang, Shen, Tang, Zhao, & Gao, 2013), recording and analyzing both the response accuracy and RT (see Table 1 for the descriptive statistics of the current study). For the RT, only trials with correct responses were entered into further analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao et al, 2011; Z. Gao et al, 2010; Serences et al, 2009; Shen et al, 2013; Woodman & Vogel, 2008; Yin, Gao, et al, 2012; Yin, Zhou, et al, 2012; Zhang et al, 2013; Zhao et al, 2018), most of them focused on static visual objects. However, biological motion is essentially an event (Shipley & Zacks, 2008); an event is a higher level cognitive structure than an object, for instance, a segment of time at a given location for an object is considered as an event if the observer perceives a beginning and an end (Zacks & Tversky, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao et al, 2011; Z. Gao et al, 2010; Shen et al, 2013; Yin, Gao, et al, 2012; Yin, Zhou, et al, 2012; Zhang et al, 2013; but see Bocincova & Johnson, 2019; Serences et al, 2009; Woodman & Vogel, 2008 for a different view). If VWM adopts a similar encoding manner for biological motion, we would predict an event -based encoding for biological motion, that is, even if only one element of an event is required to be memorised, the irrelevant elements of an event will also be extracted into VWM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…colours, shapes, orientations, sizes) 5 6 8 14 15 17 , and with different encoding times (e.g. 100 ms, 1000 ms) 5 ; it also remains constant throughout age from 6 to 72 years 19 . Moreover, the maintenance of irrelevant information in VWM can last for at least 1000 ms after the offset of the memory array 20 and is not modulated by the probability of the irrelevant-feature change, exhibiting the distracting effect with an irrelevant-change probability of 16%, 20%, and 50%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%