2022 14th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icumt57764.2022.9943443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obfuscated malware detection using dilated convolutional network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that RobustCBL achieved slightly higher accuracy due to its larger parameter size, whereas CompactCBL performed remarkably well despite being nearly 40% smaller than RobustCBL. Moreover, both models outperformed Mezina et al's Dilated CNN model [31] by 1.03% and 0.7%, respectively, which is the sole other work to evaluate multiclass classification on this dataset and reported by the authors. They also evaluated the performance of Decision Tree, but with less successful outcomes.…”
Section: Attack Family Detectionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Note that RobustCBL achieved slightly higher accuracy due to its larger parameter size, whereas CompactCBL performed remarkably well despite being nearly 40% smaller than RobustCBL. Moreover, both models outperformed Mezina et al's Dilated CNN model [31] by 1.03% and 0.7%, respectively, which is the sole other work to evaluate multiclass classification on this dataset and reported by the authors. They also evaluated the performance of Decision Tree, but with less successful outcomes.…”
Section: Attack Family Detectionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Results with this split show that RobustCBL and CompactCBL attain accuracies of 0.9994 and 0.9985, respectively, compared with 0.9943 obtained by the LSTM model in [27]. [31] 0.9992 0.99 0.99 0.99 6037 LSTM [27] 0.9943 0.99 1.00 0.99 627 Decision Tree [31] 0.9990 0.99 1.00 0.99 Not given Stacking [18] 0.9902 0.99 0.99 0.99 Not given…”
Section: Binary Attack Detectionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations