2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1577-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obesity Stigma as a Determinant of Poor Birth Outcomes in Women with High BMI: A Conceptual Framework

Abstract: Obesity stigma has been linked to poor health outcomes on an individual and population basis. However, little research has been conducted on the role of chronic or recent obesity stigma in the health disparities experienced by pregnant women with high body mass index. The purpose of this article is to discuss poor birth outcomes in this population from an integrated perinatal health framework perspective, incorporating obesity stigma as a social determinant. In studies of non-pregnant populations, obesity stig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this framing is not universally accepted as commonsense. Critical scholars writing from diverse epistemological positions have questioned both the "problem" of pregnancy fatness and the proposed solutions (Furber and McGowan, 2011;Lindhardt et al, 2013;Mulherin et al, 2013;DeJoy and Bittner, 2015). For scholars writing from a poststructural epistemological frame, contemporary knowledge about pregnancy fatness does not represent an objective truth or reality but rather historically and socially specific "truths, " constituted from multiple dominant gendered, biomedical, and neoliberal discourses about health, fatness, reproduction and mothering (Jette, 2006;Tolwinski, 2010;McNaughton, 2011;Warin et al, 2011Warin et al, , 2012Jette and Rail, 2013;Parker, 2014;Parker and Pausé, 2018).…”
Section: Pregnancy Fatness As Dominant Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this framing is not universally accepted as commonsense. Critical scholars writing from diverse epistemological positions have questioned both the "problem" of pregnancy fatness and the proposed solutions (Furber and McGowan, 2011;Lindhardt et al, 2013;Mulherin et al, 2013;DeJoy and Bittner, 2015). For scholars writing from a poststructural epistemological frame, contemporary knowledge about pregnancy fatness does not represent an objective truth or reality but rather historically and socially specific "truths, " constituted from multiple dominant gendered, biomedical, and neoliberal discourses about health, fatness, reproduction and mothering (Jette, 2006;Tolwinski, 2010;McNaughton, 2011;Warin et al, 2011Warin et al, , 2012Jette and Rail, 2013;Parker, 2014;Parker and Pausé, 2018).…”
Section: Pregnancy Fatness As Dominant Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given emerging research on the psychological and physiologic effects of weight bias, obesity stigma may be a determinant of poor birth outcomes in women with BMI greater than 30 as both a distal and proximal risk factor for stress, discrimination, unhealthy coping mechanisms, and differential care . Therefore, to optimize care and outcomes for women who are obese, providers and researchers must understand the experiences that these women have with the health care system and how those experiences may affect them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4−6 However, we as clinicians are less aware of the concept that obesity stigma may be an independent determinant of poor birth outcome. 7 As women's health providers, we need to be cognizant that our patients may have negative experiences related to our provision of care, from the sizes of the chairs in waiting areas to improperly sized medical equipment, difficulty with pregnancy and gynaecologic ultrasound image quality, and challenging pelvic examinations and Pap tests. Not surprisingly, labour and birth experiences, as well as gynaecologic procedures, provide challenges and sometimes frustrations to the care team because of the complexity around patient safety, positioning, fetal monitoring, and anaesthesia; in turn, those challenges and frustrations may be negatively perceived by our patients.…”
Section: Weight Discrimination Impact On Health Carementioning
confidence: 99%