Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objective: We evaluated the use of dental health services within the past year among adults at risk of diabetes in the Alabama Black Belt. Methods: Data for this cross-sectional study was collected in 2005-2006 through the Flying Sparks project. In addition to descriptive statistics and univariate analysis (Chi-square), we used multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the association between dental care use and diabetic status. Results: 1355 individuals responded the survey (mean age 51 years). 67.9% were females and 89.5% African-Americans. 16.7% reported history of diabetes. Overall, 54.5% of individuals had visited a dentist within the past year. Adults with diabetes were less likely than those without diabetes to have seen a dentist (13.4% vs 86.6%, p < 0.01). Females were more likely to visit a dentist in the past year (adjusted OR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.11 -1.90) than males. African-Americans were less likely than whites to have seen a dentist (adjusted OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.43 -0.97). Lower levels of education and household income were associated with a greater likelihood of not seeing a dentist in the previous year. After controlling for gender, health insurance, race, education, report of limited community health services, routine medical check-up within past year, and annual household income, individuals with diabetes were significantly less likely than those without diabetes to have seen a dentist within the preceding year (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.43 -0.84). Conclusions: Individuals with history of diabetes in the Alabama Black Belt should be encouraged to have annual dental visits as part of a comprehensive diabetes care plan.
Objective: We evaluated the use of dental health services within the past year among adults at risk of diabetes in the Alabama Black Belt. Methods: Data for this cross-sectional study was collected in 2005-2006 through the Flying Sparks project. In addition to descriptive statistics and univariate analysis (Chi-square), we used multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the association between dental care use and diabetic status. Results: 1355 individuals responded the survey (mean age 51 years). 67.9% were females and 89.5% African-Americans. 16.7% reported history of diabetes. Overall, 54.5% of individuals had visited a dentist within the past year. Adults with diabetes were less likely than those without diabetes to have seen a dentist (13.4% vs 86.6%, p < 0.01). Females were more likely to visit a dentist in the past year (adjusted OR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.11 -1.90) than males. African-Americans were less likely than whites to have seen a dentist (adjusted OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.43 -0.97). Lower levels of education and household income were associated with a greater likelihood of not seeing a dentist in the previous year. After controlling for gender, health insurance, race, education, report of limited community health services, routine medical check-up within past year, and annual household income, individuals with diabetes were significantly less likely than those without diabetes to have seen a dentist within the preceding year (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.43 -0.84). Conclusions: Individuals with history of diabetes in the Alabama Black Belt should be encouraged to have annual dental visits as part of a comprehensive diabetes care plan.
Aim The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between obesity and periodontal status as well as evaluate its association with other demographic variables like age and gender among patients in KLE Society’s Institute of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Materials and methods A total of 200 patients (aged between 18 and 70 years) visiting the KLE Dental College in Bengaluru were analyzed for obesity and periodontal status. The body mass index (BMI) was used as an indicator of obesity and calculated as the ratio of the subject’s body weight (in kg) to the square of the height (in meters). Periodontal status was evaluated using community periodontal index (CPI). The relationship between BMI and periodontal status was assessed using binary multiple logistic regression analysis. Results Results indicated a positive correlation between BMI and periodontitis in the study group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that risk of periodontitis increases by 38% for each 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI. The risk of periodontitis increases with increase in age and influence of gender is not found to be significant. Conclusion Obesity could be a potential risk factor for periodontitis. Estimation of the BMI could, thus, be used in periodontal risk assessment. Clinical significance Obesity, as measured by BMI, is hypothesized to be involved in immunoinflammatory alterations, including periodontitis. The study also showed that obesity can be a potential risk factor for periodontitis. The BMI measurement should be used regularly as a part of periodontal risk assessment. Moreover, periodontists should counsel obese persons regarding the possible oral complications of obesity, to diminish morbidity for these individuals. How to cite this article Gigras S, Patil SR, Veena HR, Walia KD. Association between Obesity and Periodontitis in a South Indian Population: A Cross-sectional Study. J Contemp Dent 2017;7(2):103-106.
Diabetes, obesity, and oral diseases (dental caries and periodontal diseases), largely preventable chronic diseases, are described as global pandemic due their distribution and severe consequences. 1-4 WHO calls for a global action for prevention and promotion regarding these diseases as a vital investment in urgent need. 1-4 Current scientific evidence provides a strong and plausible basis to assert that diabetes, obesity and oral diseases have common risk factors (poor dietary habits, a sugar-rich diet, smoking) 5-9 and biologic mechanisms. 10-17 Current research supports that there is a bidirectional relationship between type 2 diabetes (DM2) and oral health: Poor oral health negatively contributes to glycemic control whereas poor DM2 management negatively affects oral health. 17 Thus, they lead to poor systemic health conditions. 18 Obesity is a triggering risk factor both for DM2 and oral diseases, namely periodontal diseases. 10-12 Diabetes and obesity, showing an increasing trend, lead to disabilities and negatively affect the quality of life through life-course along with oral diseases. 19, 20 WHO projects that there are almost 200 million people with diabetes at present, and 3,2 million deaths/year are attributable to diabetes complications, and both will double worldwide by 2030. 19,21-23 Globally, more than 1 billion adults are overweight; almost 300 million of them are clinically obese. Being obese or overweight raises steeply the likelihood of developing DM2; approximately 85% of people with diabetes are DM2, and of these 90% are obese or overweight. 22 Promoting a good oral health is significantly essential for preventing and reducing the negative consequences of DM2 and obesity. 24 Key to successful maintenance of a high glycemic control, DM2 management and obesity, and good oral health is adherence to the regime of daily treatment and self-care practices. 25-28 However, many patients find or feel themselves unable to follow recommended lifestyles (a healthy diet, physical exercise, no smoking, medications, twice daily toothbrushing), which makes them more prone to diabetes-related complications, poor oral health and obesity; therefore leading a poor quality of life. WHO, 2 International Diabetes Federation (IDF), 29 The World Dental Federation (FDI), 30 and Council of European Dentists, 31 American Dental Association 32 underline a need to adopt a common-risk factor approach 33 for oral and general health promotion; a need for interventions integrating oral health into chronic disease management. WHO highly recommends behavioral interventions to meet this need. 34
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.