2009
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2009.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obese adults have visual attention bias for food cue images: evidence for altered reward system function

Abstract: Background:The major aim of this study was to investigate whether the motivational salience of food cues (as reflected by their attention-grabbing properties) differs between obese and normal-weight subjects in a manner consistent with altered reward system function in obesity. Methodology/Principal Findings: A total of 18 obese and 18 normal-weight, otherwise healthy, adult women between the ages of 18 and 35 participated in an eye-tracking paradigm in combination with a visual probe task. Eye movements and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

41
515
7
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 475 publications
(567 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(88 reference statements)
41
515
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…phobias) and eating behaviours. For example, there is now a body of literature demonstrating that individuals with eating disorders such as anorexia and bulimia, or a proneness to obesity, show a bias toward food, body shape and weight stimuli (see Faunce, 2002 for a review; see also Castellanos et al, 2009). This is consistent with the idea that visual attentional biases are linked to motivational systems (Mogg, Bradley, Miles & Dixon, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…phobias) and eating behaviours. For example, there is now a body of literature demonstrating that individuals with eating disorders such as anorexia and bulimia, or a proneness to obesity, show a bias toward food, body shape and weight stimuli (see Faunce, 2002 for a review; see also Castellanos et al, 2009). This is consistent with the idea that visual attentional biases are linked to motivational systems (Mogg, Bradley, Miles & Dixon, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…by testing correlations) if craving and/or hunger is associated with attention biases for food. Of the thirty reviewed studies, eleven measured craving (46,48,50,51,59,61,62,68,(72)(73)(74) and seventeen assessed hunger (19,44,(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)54,58,(60)(61)(62)(63)65,68,69,72) (with an overlap in seven studies assessing both). Eleven of these studies tested the relation of attention bias and craving or hunger statistically.…”
Section: Attention Bias For Food and Cravingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies (n 6) reported a positive association of an early attention process (e.g. direction bias) with selfreported craving or hunger (19,44,46,(48)(49)(50) . Only two studies reported null findings for correlations of an early attention component and craving (51) and/or hunger (47,51) .…”
Section: Attention Bias For Food and Cravingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, detection and awareness of food within the visual environment would have been considered as a necessary evolutionary adaption to survive (14) ; however, in today's Western environment, such a resourcefulness could be contributing to the current obesity epidemic (15) . Research has suggested that some individuals may have greater attentional bias to food-related visual cues (16)(17)(18) within their environment (for example, being more 'tuned in' or aware of the sight of a food or a related food image) and it is possible that they may be at greater risk of overeating and subsequent weight gain.…”
Section: Incentive Sensitisation: Weight Status: Eye Tracking: Visualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have previously been used to examine attention to food-related stimuli in normal weight populations in both a fasted and satiated condition (20)(21)(22) . More recently research has begun to focus on visual attention to food-related stimuli in individuals who are overweight or obese (15,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) . Results from these studies however have been inconsistent and this may be due in part to the methodology used to measure attention.…”
Section: Incentive Sensitisation: Weight Status: Eye Tracking: Visualmentioning
confidence: 99%