2005
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oat Germination Characteristics Differ among Genotypes, Seed Sizes, and Osmotic Potentials

Abstract: Ashraf and Abu-Shakra, 1978; Hao and de Jong, 1988). Several studies have indicated that germination is de-Oat (Avena sativa L.) yield and quality on the northern Great layed and reduced by low water potential (Rao and Plains are consistently reduced by frequent drought and wild oat Dao, 1987; Hao and de Jong, 1988), low temperature (Avena fatua L.) competition. Wild oat cannot be selectively removed (Livingston and de Jong, 1990; Willenborg et al., 2004), from oat with herbicides. Identifying genotypes or see… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(48 reference statements)
5
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, the combination with the lowest germinative energy (most days) was the small seed at high temperature. According to Leishman et al (2000) and Willenborg et al (2005), in some species large seeds have higher germinative energy, but in others smaller ones do. In the first case, small seeds have cotyledons and lower reserves, plus a more rapid depletion of reserve substances (Figure 3).…”
Section: Germinative Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the combination with the lowest germinative energy (most days) was the small seed at high temperature. According to Leishman et al (2000) and Willenborg et al (2005), in some species large seeds have higher germinative energy, but in others smaller ones do. In the first case, small seeds have cotyledons and lower reserves, plus a more rapid depletion of reserve substances (Figure 3).…”
Section: Germinative Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, contrary to the conventional analysis carried out by ignoring the normality assumptions, the evaluation based on the generalized linear models with a response variable that followed binomial distribution indicated the statistical significance for the three effects: storage temperature (p<0.01), culture medium (p<0.01 and p<0.05 for Type III and Type I analysis, respectively) and culture medium x storage temperature interaction (p<0.05) ( Table 3). Willenborg et al (2005) reported that the data transformations sometimes presents the statistical limitations and, traditionally, the main approach used by the agronomists and crop scientists to account for non-normality has been this procedure. Similar results between Type I and Type III analysis were evidenced (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem with the analyses of the variables representing count, proportion or binary data, is the possibility of the violation of one or more assumptions of the analysis of the variance, and then, affecting the result of the study (Sokal and Rohlf, 2003). In the germination studies where the variable response follows a non-normal distribution, three inference procedures are frequently assumed: first, in vitro seed analysis by using a non-parametric procedure (Droste et al, 2005), second, the analysis of the germination by employing the generalized linear models (Clauss and Venable, 2000;Prati and Bossdorf, 2004;Willenborg et al, 2005), and third, germination assessment by transforming of the response variable, making the distribution of the response closer to the normal distribution (McKendrick et al, 2000;Reddy, 2000;Moravcová et al, 2002;Walck et al, 2002;Hawkes, 2004). Generally, the transformations are also used for stabilizing the response variance and improving the fit of the model to the data (Myers et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El tiempo de inicio de germinación fue muy similar en todas las semillas, la mayoría germinó a los dos días de siembra, aunque WILLENBORG et al (2005) (PAYARES et al, 2014); lo que demuestra ser una especie que necesita poco tiempo para su propagación.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified