2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis

Abstract: The OARSI recommended set of performance-based tests of physical function represents the tests of typical activities relevant to individuals diagnosed with hip or knee OA and following joint replacements. These tests are complementary to patient-reported measures and are recommended as prospective outcome measures in future OA research and to assist decision-making in clinical practice. Further research should be directed to expanding the measurement-property evidence of the recommended tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
646
0
14

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 600 publications
(666 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
646
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…For the selection of activities, an expert group in the field of OA (i.e., physical therapists, a rehabilitation physician, an orthopedic surgeon, a rheumatologist, [human movement] scientists, and patient research partners) used the following sources: the ICF core set for hip and knee OA (18), items in existing self-reported questionnaires (19,20), performance-based tests (21,22), and self-reported activity limitations (by using the Patient-Specific Complaints Questionnaire) (23) collected from 400 patients in the Amsterdam Osteoarthritis (AMS-OA) cohort in an outpatient center for rehabilitation and rheumatology (Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (24).…”
Section: Significance and Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the selection of activities, an expert group in the field of OA (i.e., physical therapists, a rehabilitation physician, an orthopedic surgeon, a rheumatologist, [human movement] scientists, and patient research partners) used the following sources: the ICF core set for hip and knee OA (18), items in existing self-reported questionnaires (19,20), performance-based tests (21,22), and self-reported activity limitations (by using the Patient-Specific Complaints Questionnaire) (23) collected from 400 patients in the Amsterdam Osteoarthritis (AMS-OA) cohort in an outpatient center for rehabilitation and rheumatology (Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (24).…”
Section: Significance and Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a randomly selected subgroup of patients was assigned to 3 performance-based tests: the stair climbing test (SCT) (21,22,29,30), timed up and go test (TUG) (21,22,31,32), and 30-second chair stand test (CST) (21,22,33,34). The SCT measures the time (in seconds) needed for ascending and descending a flight of 9 stairs.…”
Section: Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous efforts at defining universal standards for measuring hip and knee OA outcomes have focused on assessment of physical functioning and metrics for use in clinical trials 11, 12. However, there is no common definition of key outcome measures for use in clinical care across all treatments for this condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, WOMACbased based functional results reported in this study should be examined in the context of results obtained with standardized performance-based measures of physical activity and the continuous monitoring of physical activity with wearable technology. 39,40 Similarly, quantification of pain during standardized physical tasks may provide more robust outcomes data that could actually strengthen the correlation between immune parameters and clinical outcomes. Forth, none of the evoked signaling responses correlated significantly with recovery from fatigue and resulting functional impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%