2022
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2020.3048013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OANet: Learning Two-View Correspondences and Geometry Using Order-Aware Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
151
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively to making RANSAC differentiable, some authors propose to replace RANSAC by a neural network [61], [62], [63], [64], [65]. In these works, the neural network acts as a classifier for model inliers, effectively acting as a robust estimator for model parameters.…”
Section: Differentiable Robust Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively to making RANSAC differentiable, some authors propose to replace RANSAC by a neural network [61], [62], [63], [64], [65]. In these works, the neural network acts as a classifier for model inliers, effectively acting as a robust estimator for model parameters.…”
Section: Differentiable Robust Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the handcrafted methods, two variations of nearest neighbor (NN) matching, the mutual NN with PyTorch implementation, and the FLANN with OpenCV implementation when the test ratio is 0.7, were evaluated. For the learned methods, the PointCN [16], OANet [18], ACNe [19], and SuperGlue [28] were assessed. During testing, the official released code and model weights were used.…”
Section: Comparison To Related Work 1) Setupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the predicted keypoint matches of an image pair, the essential matrix is obtained with OpenCV function findEssentialMat, and then the relative pose is recovered with recoverPose. As in previous works [16], [18], [28], we calculate the pose angular differences between ground truth and estimated pose, and report the area under curve (AUC) with a maximum error of threshold 5°, 10°, and 20°.…”
Section: ) Pose Estimation Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this study could not take advantage of the relative motion pose shared by neighboring pixels [ 53 ]. Zhang et al [ 54 ] used neural networks to infer the probability of each corresponding point as an interior point and then restored the camera pose. Tabb et al [ 55 ] used rigid constraints to represent the camera network and multi-camera calibration problem and expressed it as a system of equations to obtain approximate solutions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%