2019
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbz021.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O4.4. Confidence, Performance, and Accuracy of Self-Assessment of Social Cognition: A Comparison of Schizophrenia Patients and Healthy Controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the ER-40, participants indicated their confidence as 0% (not at all confident), 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% (very confident) [ 39 ]. Confidence ratings on each item were averaged into a single average confidence score, which was calculated separately for each task [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the ER-40, participants indicated their confidence as 0% (not at all confident), 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% (very confident) [ 39 ]. Confidence ratings on each item were averaged into a single average confidence score, which was calculated separately for each task [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People with schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar disorders demonstrate difficulty in accurately evaluating their neurocognitive, social cognitive, and functional abilities [ 2 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Deficits in IA are bidirectional, and people have been found to both under- and overestimate their abilities [ 2 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. The direction of IA discrepancies (i.e., under- and overestimation) has been referred to as “introspective bias” (IB) [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations