2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b07885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O2(b1Σg+) Quenching by O2, CO2, H2O, and N2 at Temperatures of 300–800 K

Abstract: Rate constants for the removal of O(bΣ) by collisions with O, N, CO, and HO have been determined over the temperature range from 297 to 800 K. O(bΣ) was excited by pulses from a tunable dye laser, and the deactivation kinetics were followed by observing the temporal behavior of the bΣ-XΣ fluorescence. The removal rate constants for CO, N, and HO were not strongly dependent on temperature and could be represented by the expressions k = (1.18 ± 0.05) × 10 × T × exp[Formula: see text], k = (8 ± 0.3) × 10 × T × ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the shock tube experiment of Borell et al [65] overestimates the rate constant at room temperature. Therefore, in this work, we used data from Zagidullin et al [66]. However, despite the increased gas temperatures observed in our experiments at higher pressures and currents, the rate of this is insignificant compared to the rates of surface loss of O 2 (b 1 Σ g + ).…”
Section: Reaction Schemementioning
confidence: 90%
“…It should be noted that the shock tube experiment of Borell et al [65] overestimates the rate constant at room temperature. Therefore, in this work, we used data from Zagidullin et al [66]. However, despite the increased gas temperatures observed in our experiments at higher pressures and currents, the rate of this is insignificant compared to the rates of surface loss of O 2 (b 1 Σ g + ).…”
Section: Reaction Schemementioning
confidence: 90%
“…This reaction is the reverse of the O 2 (b 1 Σ g + ) production process (R2) and its rate constant was obtained from [50] using the calculated thermodynamic equilibrium constant combined with the measured rate of the forward reaction (R2). In addition, the reaction (R4) was taken into account with the temperature dependence k (R4) (T ) = (7.4 ± 0.8) × 10 −17 T 0.5 exp((−1105.7 ± 53.3)/T) cm 3 s −1 (see table 2) in accordance with recent data of [51].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 61%