O que fazer com a pequena agricultura? As soluções diante da conservação

Abstract

The environmental conservation employed within the limits of the Guaraqueçaba´s APA (Conservation Area Zone), northern littoral of the state of Paraná, demanded from conservationists´ activists a reflection upon how to deal with the small-scale agriculture, that has been developed for the most part by populations who have been living there for many years. Even that all of the solutions have been presented to them in terms of conservation, they have suffered changes during the process of protection that was estabilished there. This paper analyses the relation between the solutions proposed from 1981 to 2000 and the different participants involved in the process of conservation inside the APA.

"Biodiversity Conservation" in Brazilian Social Sciences: A Systematic Review From 1992 to 2010

“…xiii Despite not being in our selection, Diegues is widely referenced by the authors in the articles under analysis. xiv These two categories had already been contemplated in the Forest Code in the 1960s (Law 4,771/1965) and were recently redesigned through a redrafting of the legislation (Law 12,651/2012) xv Studies on the Guaraqueçaba APA are an important reference regarding this question (DUMORA, 2006;TEIXEIRA, 2006). xvi This research complements the mapping undertaken by of the analyses in environmental sociology studying traditional populations that reside inside or in the outskirts of UCs.…”

“…The limitations of environmental policies when it comes to the need for "development" is a concern by many authors who have called attention to the incoherence in the activities by governmental bodies at different levels (federal, state and municipal). It is worth highlighting some studies about the APA (Area of Environmental Protection) of Guaraqueçaba, which analyse related issues (DUMORA, 2006;TEIXEIRA, 2006).…”

“…Setting off from the premise that conflicts are presupposed in the implementation of conservation policies, these authors proceed by describing the conflicts resulting from the implementation of UCs, without necessarily pointing to possible mitigating strategies. In these cases, they acknowledge the different solutions proposed by the social actors themselves, instead of presenting ways to resolve the conflicts DUMORA, 2006;TEIXEIRA, 2006;VIVAQCUA et al, 2009).…”

“…xviii Cf. Dumora (2006); Rodrigues et al (2003); Teixeira (2005) and Teixeira (2006) xix National Technical Committee on Biosafety (Comissão Técnica Nacional de Biossegurança), part of the Ministry for Science and Technology. xx There is only one article in the review that elaborates an argument compatible with this view.…”