2014
DOI: 10.5007/1984-8412.2014v11n3p243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O processamento da anáfora “se” em português brasileiro e a influência da variação dialetal

Abstract: RESUMO: O objetivo desta pesquisa foi investigar se diferentes tipos de retomada [se, Ø, ele(a)] podem influenciar o processamento correferencial de estruturas reflexivas, relacionando a estas a semântica do predicado verbal. Para verificar se a variação dialetal do uso da anáfora se (uso, supressão, e substituição) poderia influenciar o processamento destas estruturas, foi realizado um experimento de leitura automonitorada em Minas Gerais e Paraíba. Os resultados evidenciaram um efeito significativo do tipo d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The excessive restrictiveness of the Unified View can be illustrated with data from the dialect of Brazilian Portuguese (BP) spoken in the states of São Paulo and Minas Gerais. I will specifically look at the behavior of the 3sg p-pronouns ele ('him') and ela ('her') as it is reported in previous theoretical and experimental literature (Moreira da Silva, 1983;Galves, 1986;Menuzzi, 1999;Grolla, 2011;Grolla & Bertolino, 2011;Lacerda et al, 2014;Varaschin, 2021).…”
Section: The Unified View Is Too Strongmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The excessive restrictiveness of the Unified View can be illustrated with data from the dialect of Brazilian Portuguese (BP) spoken in the states of São Paulo and Minas Gerais. I will specifically look at the behavior of the 3sg p-pronouns ele ('him') and ela ('her') as it is reported in previous theoretical and experimental literature (Moreira da Silva, 1983;Galves, 1986;Menuzzi, 1999;Grolla, 2011;Grolla & Bertolino, 2011;Lacerda et al, 2014;Varaschin, 2021).…”
Section: The Unified View Is Too Strongmentioning
confidence: 97%