Abstract:The musearlnie receptors are currently divided into at least three subtypes: M 1 , M 2 a and M 2 ß (for recent reviews, see Eglen and Whiting, 1986; Mutschier et al., 1987;1988). M 1 -Receptors are found in high density in neuronal tissues such as autonomic ganglia, cerebral cortex and hippocampus, whereas M 2 -receptors are mainly present in lower brain areas and in peripheral effector organs such as heart (M 2 a) and smooth musdes (M 2 ß) as weil as glands (M 2 ß). Their different affinities for selective m… Show more
“…In the present study 60 p.g/rat was the highest dose of methoctramine tested, as we observed that administration of 100 p.gjrat plus carbachol 1 p.g pro- Melchiorre et al (1987), c Lambrecht et al (1988a). d Lambrecht et al (1988c). c Lambrecht et al (1988b), r Eltze (1988), and 1 Eglen and Whiting (1986).…”
Section: Effect Of Muscarinic Antagonists On Carbacho/-induced Drisupporting
The present study served to investigate the ability of seven selective muscarinic antagonists to inhibit carbachol-induced drinking in the rat. The muscarinic antagonists were given by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection 1 min before the i.c.v. injection of carbachol (1 p.gjrat). The M 2 antagonist, methoctramine, was inactive up to 80.3 nmoljrat. The M 3 antagonist, p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol, elicited a modest (42%) but statistically significant inhibition of drinking only at 80 nmoljrat. On the other band, the selective M 1 antagonists, (R)-trihexyphenidyl, o-methoxy-sila-hexocyclium and pirenzepine, produced a marked and dose-dependent inhibition of carbachol-induced drinking, their 10 50 values being 0.51. 7.36 and 9.31 nmoljrat. Also the M 1 /M 3 antagonists, 4-diphenylacetoxy-Nmethylpiperidine methiodide and hexahydro-sila-difen.idol, were potent inhibitors of carbachol-induced drinking, their I 0 50 values (0.28 and 11.09 nmoljrat) being related to their pA 2 values for M 1 receptors in rabbi t vas deferens. These data suggest that carbachol-induced drinking may be mediated by activation of muscarinic M 1 receptors.
“…In the present study 60 p.g/rat was the highest dose of methoctramine tested, as we observed that administration of 100 p.gjrat plus carbachol 1 p.g pro- Melchiorre et al (1987), c Lambrecht et al (1988a). d Lambrecht et al (1988c). c Lambrecht et al (1988b), r Eltze (1988), and 1 Eglen and Whiting (1986).…”
Section: Effect Of Muscarinic Antagonists On Carbacho/-induced Drisupporting
The present study served to investigate the ability of seven selective muscarinic antagonists to inhibit carbachol-induced drinking in the rat. The muscarinic antagonists were given by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection 1 min before the i.c.v. injection of carbachol (1 p.gjrat). The M 2 antagonist, methoctramine, was inactive up to 80.3 nmoljrat. The M 3 antagonist, p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol, elicited a modest (42%) but statistically significant inhibition of drinking only at 80 nmoljrat. On the other band, the selective M 1 antagonists, (R)-trihexyphenidyl, o-methoxy-sila-hexocyclium and pirenzepine, produced a marked and dose-dependent inhibition of carbachol-induced drinking, their 10 50 values being 0.51. 7.36 and 9.31 nmoljrat. Also the M 1 /M 3 antagonists, 4-diphenylacetoxy-Nmethylpiperidine methiodide and hexahydro-sila-difen.idol, were potent inhibitors of carbachol-induced drinking, their I 0 50 values (0.28 and 11.09 nmoljrat) being related to their pA 2 values for M 1 receptors in rabbi t vas deferens. These data suggest that carbachol-induced drinking may be mediated by activation of muscarinic M 1 receptors.
“…M1 receptors are above all found in the nervous system and are characterized by a high affinity for pirenzepine Birdsall et al, 1980;Brown et al, 1980;Hammer & Giachetti, 1982;Lambrecht et al, 1988b). M2 receptors, which show low affinity for pirenzepine, have been further subdivided into cardiac type and glandular/ smooth muscle subtypes by use of selective antago-1 Author for correspondence.…”
In an attempt to assess the structural requirements for the muscarinic receptor selectivity of hexahydro-diphenidol (hexahydro-difenidol) and hexahydro-sila-diphenidol (hexahydro-sila-difenidol), a series of structurally related C/Si pairs were investigated, along with atropine, pirenzepine and methoctramine, for their binding affinities in NB-OK 1 cells as well as in rat heart and pancreas.2 The action of these antagonists at muscarinic receptors mediating negative inotropic responses in guinea-pig atria and ileal contractions has also been assessed. 3 Antagonist binding data indicated that NB-OK 1 cells (M1 type) as well as rat heart (cardiac type) and pancreas (glandular/smooth muscle type) possess different muscarinic receptor subtypes. 4 A highly significant correlation was found between the binding affinities of the antagonists to muscarinic receptors in rat heart and pancreas, respectively, and the affinities to muscarinic receptors in guinea-pig atria and ileum. This implies that the muscarinic binding sites in rat heart and the receptors in guinea-pig atria are essentially similar, but different from those in pancreas and ileum. 5 The antimuscarinic potency of hexahydro-diphenidol and hexahydro-sila-diphenidol at the three subtypes was influenced differently by structural modifications (e.g. quaternization). Different selectivity profiles for the antagonists were obtained, which makes these compounds useful tools to investigate further muscarinic receptor heterogeneity. Indeed, the tertiary analogues hexahydrodiphenidol (HHD) and hexahydro-sila-diphenidol (HHSiD) had an M1 = glandular/smooth muscle > cardiac selectivity profile, whereas the quaternary analogues HHD methiodide and HHSiD methiodide were M1 preferring (M1 > glandular/smooth muscle, cardiac).
“…The M1 subtype exhibits a high affinity toward pirenzepine and o-methoxy-silahexocyclium (see Eglen & Whiting, 1986 for review;Lambrecht et al, 1988); the M2 subtype exhibits a high affinity toward methoctramine (Michel & Whiting, 1988) and the M3 subtype exhibits a high affinity toward hexahydrosiladiphenidol and silahexocyclium (Mutschler et al, 1987). The anatomical location of these subtypes suggest that the cerebral cortex, heart and salivary gland possess a preponderance of M1, M2 and M3 receptors respectively (Doods et al, 1987).…”
The muscarinic receptor present on the guinea-pig uterus has been characterized by use of both functional and radioligand binding studies. The contractile responses to carbachol were antagonized by atropine, pirenzepine, methoctramine and hexamethonium with pA2 values consistent with the presence of an M2 receptor (i.e. 9.5, 7.0, 8.0 and 3.7 respectively). In binding studies, pKi values were also observed for pirenzepine, methoctramine and AF-DX 116 which were consistent with the presence of a homogeneous M2 receptor population (i.e. 6.6, 7.9 and 7.1 respectively). The uterus therefore possesses M2 receptors through which a functional contractile response is mediated and in this respect it is clearly different from other smooth muscles. M2 receptors in the uterus mediate excitatory responses, an effect in contrast to their action in other tissues.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.