2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O/M ratio determination and oxidation behaviour of Th0.80Am0.20O2−x

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a general trend, we can see in Figure that the lattice parameter decreases with time for each composition. This evolution of the unit cell is characteristic of an oxidation process, which is besides in perfect agreement with the very high specific area of the studied NPs. Considering the oxidation mechanism in UO 2 , , one can assume here that U IV has been oxidized into higher valence states in agreement with the O/M ratio greater than 2.00.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As a general trend, we can see in Figure that the lattice parameter decreases with time for each composition. This evolution of the unit cell is characteristic of an oxidation process, which is besides in perfect agreement with the very high specific area of the studied NPs. Considering the oxidation mechanism in UO 2 , , one can assume here that U IV has been oxidized into higher valence states in agreement with the O/M ratio greater than 2.00.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Although the open literature indicates that the O/M ratio may be derived using several methods including thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), back-titration method, and thermodynamical modeling, the discrepancy of the results often encountered indicates that an accurate determination remains difficult. Indeed, TGA would be the natural method to measure the O/M ratio of an oxide, but in the case of a trivalent substituting cation, one can only assume both initial and final O/M values or rely on a significant change around the 2.0 ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%