2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13550-017-0316-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET in gliomas: influence of data processing in different centres

Abstract: BackgroundPET using O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) is an established method for brain tumour diagnostics, but data processing varies in different centres. This study analyses the influence of methodological differences between two centres for tumour characterization with 18F-FET PET using the same PET scanner.Methodological differences between centres A and B in the evaluation of 18F-FET PET data were identified for (1) framing of PET dynamic data, (2) data reconstruction, (3) cut-off values for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We here demonstrate that the identification of two distinct prognostic subgroups among patients with IDH-wildtype astrocytic gliomas of WHO grades III or IV is possible using a TTP threshold of 25 min. As suggested previously [45], one reason might be the slightly different dynamic FET PET imaging protocol used in different centres, e.g. scanning time of 50 min in our centre compared with 40 min in other centres [18,26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We here demonstrate that the identification of two distinct prognostic subgroups among patients with IDH-wildtype astrocytic gliomas of WHO grades III or IV is possible using a TTP threshold of 25 min. As suggested previously [45], one reason might be the slightly different dynamic FET PET imaging protocol used in different centres, e.g. scanning time of 50 min in our centre compared with 40 min in other centres [18,26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is no consensus on how the adaptive thresholding should be applied. Filss et al showed that the threshold choice applied had logically a large importance on tumor volume [ 26 ]. It is important to note that because of the low resolution and manual segmentation, the absence of thresholding (either fixed or adaptive) would have introduced contour overflow and may also have decreased performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Textural feature analysis may thus prove useful as part of the diagnostic work-up rather than as a stand-alone measure. In order to assess the value of textural feature analysis in clinical routine, comparative studies evaluating the effect of different PET scanners and parameters on the comparability and reproducibility of textural feature analysis warrants further investigation 26 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%