2019
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NYC START: A New Model for Securing Community Services for Individuals Hospitalized for First-Episode Psychosis

Abstract: and Mental Hygiene when individuals ages 18-30 are hospitalized for first-episode psychosis (FEP). This study examined the implementation of NYC START, a program that meets patients hospitalized with FEP to offer a voluntary, 3-month critical time intervention provided by social workers and peer specialists to connect individuals to appropriate community mental health services after discharge.Methods: Service logs completed by program staff were summarized to determine the mean number of contacts received per … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MA, the majority of clinics serve individuals aged 15–30, and include a range of psychosis diagnoses with an onset within 3 years. This is similar to reports from clinics in California and New York, though global differences exist in program eligibility criteria (Anderson et al, 2019; Niendam et al, 2019). With the expansion of early psychosis services and standardization of assessments to evaluate their impact, it is important to be aware of these inconsistencies; for example, the inclusion of affective or at‐risk patients, differing age ranges and varying insurance statuses of patients and healthcare contexts across countries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In MA, the majority of clinics serve individuals aged 15–30, and include a range of psychosis diagnoses with an onset within 3 years. This is similar to reports from clinics in California and New York, though global differences exist in program eligibility criteria (Anderson et al, 2019; Niendam et al, 2019). With the expansion of early psychosis services and standardization of assessments to evaluate their impact, it is important to be aware of these inconsistencies; for example, the inclusion of affective or at‐risk patients, differing age ranges and varying insurance statuses of patients and healthcare contexts across countries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Nevertheless, comprehensive EIS and outpatient treatments seem essential to improve patient´s engagement throughout long-term treatment [27]. However, since many young people with EP are hospitalized during their first psychotic episodes [22][23][24], specialized inpatient treatment for this population may represent the first step of specialized targeted interventions, and widen the scope of current well-evaluated and effective EIS. Thus, combining specialized inpatient treatment with outpatient EIS in young people with EP may help reduce and alleviate potential devastating consequences of EP for individuals, families, and societies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many individuals with EP are hospitalized during the first psychotic episode [ 22 24 ] and often experience their first hospitalization as traumatic [ 25 ], all EIS evaluated in recent RCTs commenced after hospitalization as outpatient and/or assertive outreach treatments, and do not include specialized inpatient treatment [ 3 ]. To our knowledge, only two studies of specialized inpatients treatments for EP exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%