Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10511-018-9516-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NY Ser: Outburst Activity and Multiperiodic Processes in its Various Stages During 2014 and 2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It lasted about 18-19 days, including rebrightening and taking into account that the start of the superoutburst was around JD 2457216 according to the VSNET announcement. Note that this duration was the same as those of another dwarf novae in the period gap NY Ser (Pavlenko et al 2014, Sklyanov et al 2018) and MN Dra (Sklyanov et al in preparation). The amplitude of normal outbursts was a few tenths of magnitude less and varied, which is caused by the large variations of the quiescent brightness.…”
Section: Long-term Light Curve Cycles and Supercyclementioning
confidence: 62%
“…It lasted about 18-19 days, including rebrightening and taking into account that the start of the superoutburst was around JD 2457216 according to the VSNET announcement. Note that this duration was the same as those of another dwarf novae in the period gap NY Ser (Pavlenko et al 2014, Sklyanov et al 2018) and MN Dra (Sklyanov et al in preparation). The amplitude of normal outbursts was a few tenths of magnitude less and varied, which is caused by the large variations of the quiescent brightness.…”
Section: Long-term Light Curve Cycles and Supercyclementioning
confidence: 62%
“…The refined relation was shown in Kato et al (2016b) and Kato et al (2017a) [we consider that Kato et al (2017a) to be the final regular summary of the statistics]. The stage A, B and C are now well-established and used in many publications by various authors: Katysheva et al (2014Katysheva et al ( ), B ąkowska et al (2014, Sklyanov et al (2016), Neustroev et al (2017), Ba ¸kowska et al (2017), Neustroev et al (2018), Sklyanov et al (2018), Littlefield et al (2018), Pala et al (2018), Pala et al (2019), Pavlenko et al (2019), McAllister et al (2019), Court et al (2019) (this work also illustrates the difficulty in determining superhump times in a deeply eclipsing system). The rapid growth of papers referring to our superhump stages indicates that this concept and application are now widely accepted in this field.…”
Section: Su Uma-type Dwarf Novae and Superhump Stagesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…NY Ser is an object in the period gap (Nogami et al 1998;Sklyanov et al 2018). It has been shown that "longnormal" outbursts (long outbursts without superhumps) were recorded in this object (Pavlenko et al 2014).…”
Section: Behavior Near Limit Of Tidal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be, however, worth noting that long superhump period of 0.10516(3) d was detected during the post-superoutburst phase (with dwarf nova outbursts) between BJD 2458213 and 2458222 (see E-figure 3 in SI). The fractional superhump excess (in frequency) ǫ * ≡ 1 − P orb /P SH , where P SH is the superhump period, was very large [0.0723(2)] using P orb =0.097558(6) d in Sklyanov et al (2018). If this long superhump period reflects the dynamical precession rate (i.e.…”
Section: Superhumpsmentioning
confidence: 99%