2006
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2006.332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NXG03-4: XCP-i : eXplicit Control Protocol for Heterogeneous Inter-Networking of High-Speed Networks

Abstract: XCP is a transport protocol that uses the assistance of specialized routers to very accurately determine the available bandwidth along the path from the source to the destination. In this way, XCP efficiently controls the sender's congestion window size thus avoiding the traditional slow-start and congestion avoidance phase. However, XCP requires the collaboration of all the routers on the data path which is almost impossible to achieve in an incremental deployment scenario of XCP. It has been shown that XCP b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, when the TCP New Reno congestion window is smaller than the XCP congestion window, TCP New Reno throughput is slightly lower than 20Mb/s. However, when the XCP sender receives misleading congestion window in non-fully XCP-capable network, XCP might perform worse than E2E protocols [19]. When the bottleneck is ERN-capable, ERN protocols can compute the optimal congestion window.…”
Section: Rationale Of Ip-ern Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, when the TCP New Reno congestion window is smaller than the XCP congestion window, TCP New Reno throughput is slightly lower than 20Mb/s. However, when the XCP sender receives misleading congestion window in non-fully XCP-capable network, XCP might perform worse than E2E protocols [19]. When the bottleneck is ERN-capable, ERN protocols can compute the optimal congestion window.…”
Section: Rationale Of Ip-ern Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major problem to the deployment of such concept is that ERN protocols do not implement any mechanisms to deal with networks where non-ERN protocols (e.g., standard TCP) and non-ERN equipments (e.g., DropTail routers) are present. Indeed, it has been proved that ERN protocols can perform worse than every TCP variant in non-fully ERN-capable networks [19,20]. Therefore, ERN protocols cannot be used in heterogeneous networks and can not be gradually deployed in the current Internet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XCC router will then be able to create one independent virtual queue for each of its peering XCC routers. A description of such an approach is presented in [92].…”
Section: Non-xcc Routersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28][29], explore the advantages of router-assisted congestion control for the Internet. More recently [30][31][32][33] effective solutions and alternatives to TCP end-to-end congestion control have been discussed, with algorithms based on explicit congestion signaling. One of the key aspects of these mechanisms is the capability to perform selective notifications of congestion through explicit congestion information to sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%