2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NVH robust optimization of gear macro and microgeometries using an efficient tooth contact model

Abstract: This paper presents a methodology for the multiobjective optimization of both gear macro and microgeometry parameters in order to minimize the Static Transmission Error (STE) and the mesh stiffness fluctuations generated by the meshing process. The optimization is performed using a genetic algorithm which allows testing of a high number of gears. As the repeti

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, only the compliance of the gear wheel is taken into account. It is calculated from a thick plate model using a Reissner-Mindlin theory [20] where the variable thickness ℎ( ) of the plate corresponds to the tooth thickness [21]. The Hertz deformation is also added in the compliance For each of the successive positions of the driving wheel, the mesh stiffness ( ) is defined as the derivative of the transmitted load relative to STE:…”
Section: Static Transmission Error Ste(t) and Mesh Stiffness Fluctuatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, only the compliance of the gear wheel is taken into account. It is calculated from a thick plate model using a Reissner-Mindlin theory [20] where the variable thickness ℎ( ) of the plate corresponds to the tooth thickness [21]. The Hertz deformation is also added in the compliance For each of the successive positions of the driving wheel, the mesh stiffness ( ) is defined as the derivative of the transmitted load relative to STE:…”
Section: Static Transmission Error Ste(t) and Mesh Stiffness Fluctuatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second reason concerns the coupling between the global behaviour of the whole transmission and the local behaviour at the gear mesh [20]. As a first necessary step, many studies focus on the optimization of gear macro and micro-geometries to reduce unintended vibroacoustic phenomena [3,11,22,23,35,39] but noise reduction remains a challenge. The accurate estimation of the STE is still a major task for the NVH prediction of geared transmissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact lines are assumed to be located in the theoretical action plane and the gear static equilibrium is then modelled by separating the gear compliance and the local contact equations along the contact lines [24,1,2,30]. Thus, the gear tooth compliance is preliminarily computed by a finite element analysis or by some alternative analytical tooth bending models using for example Ritz-Galerkin interpolation [11]. Generally, the nonlinear hertzian-like deformation is independently introduced either with an exact or approximate formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Mao 11 introduced an accurate method for estimating STE in powertrain transmission systems through an accurate gear contact analysis. The analytical method 1,[14][15][16][17][18] has the advantages of fast calculation speed and good accuracy, but its application range is narrow. For example, analytical method is used in the literature 1 to calculate timevarying mesh stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%