1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)44082-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Support of Children with Neoplastic Diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TPN is expensive and cannot be used without consideration of the cost bene® t. We chose to evaluate children with WT because these patients often have a poor nutritional status. Also, the tumor is potentially curable and constitutes 6± 10% of childhood cancer in African countries [4,9,18]. In this study there was no difference in survival between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TPN is expensive and cannot be used without consideration of the cost bene® t. We chose to evaluate children with WT because these patients often have a poor nutritional status. Also, the tumor is potentially curable and constitutes 6± 10% of childhood cancer in African countries [4,9,18]. In this study there was no difference in survival between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…The results of the basic anthropometry used here were considered a fair indication of the nutritional status of this subgroup of patients because the proportion of poorly nourished children corresponded to the results obtained in a previous local comprehensive survey to determine the nutritional status in all children with cancer [3]. More comprehensive parameters to evaluate nutritional status would ideally include a recently documented weight loss of¸5% of body weight, the serum albumin level, triceps, and subscapular skin-fold thickness and the creatinine height index [4,19]. These data were not available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement in nutritional status, expressed in terms of weight as a percentage of the ideal weight, was de®nitely more impressive in the experimental group (all the children reached their ideal weight) than in the retrospective group. According to Coates et al (1986) the difference in response to nutritional support may be due to differences in age, tumour type, intensity and kind of oncological treatment. These factors are not likely to have caused the difference in nutritional response between the two groups in this study, because there was only a slight difference in age between the two groups, the distribution of tumour types was matched as far as possible and all the children underwent long periods of intensive chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of malnutrition at the time of diagnosis has been reported to be as high as 50% in patients with Stage IV neuroblastoma (18). Other pediatric malignancies that have been associated with an increased risk of protein-energy malnutrition include advanced stage Wilms' tumor, Ewing's sarcoma, and relapsed solid tumors or leukemias (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a trend toward improved survival was observed at one year, no statistical significance was demonstrated. Interpretation of albumin concentrations must take into account adaptive phenomenon that affect serum values, such as dehydration, gastrointestinal losses, preexisting liver disease, and many other confounding variables (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%