Severe closed head injury (CHI) is a significant clinical and public health problem, with the Canadian incidence estimated at 11.4 per 100000. 1 The frequency of use, perceived appropriateness, and effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic interventions for severe CHI remain unknown. 2,3 Although guidelines for the treatment of severe CHI exist, 4 some investigations have suggested that more aggressive treatment is ABSTRACT: Objective: To determine: 1. the degrees of consensus and disagreement among Canadian critical care clinicians regarding the appropriateness (benefit exceeding risk) of common therapeutic manoeuvres in patients with severe closed head injury (CHI), and 2. the frequency with which clinicians employed these manoeuvres. Methods: The study design was a systematic scenario-based survey of all neurosurgeons and critical care physicians treating patients with severe CHI in Canada. Results: In the scenario of acute epidural hematoma with mass effect, respondents agreed very strongly that surgery was appropriate. Clinicians reported mannitol and hypertonic saline as appropriate. Beyond these two interventions, agreement was less strong, and the use of the extraventricular drain (EVD), phenytoin, cooling, hyperventilation, nimodipine, and jugular venous oximetry (JVO) were of uncertain appropriateness. Steroids were considered inappropriate. In a scenario of diffuse axonal injury (DAI), clinicians agreed strongly that fever reduction, early enteral feeding, intensive glucose control, and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)-directed management were appropriate. The use of mannitol, hypertonic saline, EVD, JVO, narcotics and propofol were also appropriate. Neuromuscular blockade, surgery, and hyperventilation were of uncertain appropriateness. The appropriateness ratings of the interventions considered in the scenario of an intracranial contusion mirrored the DAI scenario. In general, correlations between the reported appropriateness and frequency of use of each intervention were very high. An exception noted was the use of the JVO. The correlation between CPP-guided therapy and the use of the EVD was weak. Conclusions: This survey has described current practice with regard to treatment of patients with severe CHI. Areas of variation in perceived appropriateness were identified that may benefit from further evaluation. Suggested priorities for evaluation include the use of osmotic diuretics, anticonvulsants, and intracranial manometry.RĂSUMĂ: EnquĂȘte sur le traitement du traumatisme cĂ©rĂ©bral sĂ©vĂšre au Canada. Objectif : Nous voulions dĂ©terminer le degrĂ© de consensus ou de dĂ©saccord entre les mĂ©decins rĂ©animateurs concernant la pertinence (bĂ©nĂ©fices/risques) de traitements couramment utilisĂ©s dans la prise en charge des traumatismes crĂąniens fermĂ©s sĂ©vĂšres (TCF) et la frĂ©quence d'utilisation de ces traitements. MĂ©thodes : Nous avons effectuĂ© une enquĂȘte systĂ©matique basĂ©e sur des scĂ©narios auprĂšs de tous les neurochirurgiens et mĂ©decins rĂ©animateurs qui traitent des patients atteints de TCF au Canada. RĂ©s...