The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional support for critically ill children

Abstract: The objective of this review is to assess the impact of enteral and total parenteral nutrition on clinically important outcomes in critically ill children. There are two primary hypotheses:1. the mortality rate of critically ill children fed enterally or parenterally is different compared to children who are given no nutrition; 2. the mortality rate of critically ill children fed enterally is different compared to children fed parenterally.If data are available, we will conduct subgroup analyses to examine whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…180 There is a paucity of data on nutrition support for the critically ill child, which remains a controversial topic. 182,183 One randomized controlled trial of an arginine/glutamine-fortified formula in 40 ventilated pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury showed no difference in outcomes compared with standard formula, but with a sample size of 20 children per arm, the study was insufficiently powered to answer questions on mortality and other clinical outcomes. In this study, nitrogen balance by day 5 became positive in 69.2% vs 30.8% of children who received immunonutrition vs regular formula, respectively (P < .05).…”
Section: Arginine Supplementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…180 There is a paucity of data on nutrition support for the critically ill child, which remains a controversial topic. 182,183 One randomized controlled trial of an arginine/glutamine-fortified formula in 40 ventilated pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury showed no difference in outcomes compared with standard formula, but with a sample size of 20 children per arm, the study was insufficiently powered to answer questions on mortality and other clinical outcomes. In this study, nitrogen balance by day 5 became positive in 69.2% vs 30.8% of children who received immunonutrition vs regular formula, respectively (P < .05).…”
Section: Arginine Supplementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paediatric literature, commonly accepted criteria for nutritional intervention (Table 1) are not evidence based (4,11), and the objectives of EN depend on the clinical condition of the patient (12)(13)(14). Specific clinical situations for which paediatric EN may be required are listed in Table 2 (5,11,(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Indications For Enteral Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical situations for which EN could be required(11,14,(18)(19)(20) EN ¼ enteral nutrition; UGI ¼ upper gastrointestinal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current nutritional recommendations for critically ill children are based on little evidence, as highlighted by the Cochrane Collaboration [3]. The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%