1991
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90001-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional supplementation, psychosocial stimulation, and mental development of stunted children: the Jamaican Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
422
0
15

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 554 publications
(473 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
12
422
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…were enrolled and matched to the control group for age, sex and neighborhood. 16 The main focus of the original study was the effects of the interventions on child development. The sample size (64 supplemented or not, 64 stimulated or not) was determined for the developmental outcomes and gave 80% power at a 5% significance level to detect a benefit to development from either intervention of 0.5 s.d.…”
Section: Initial Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were enrolled and matched to the control group for age, sex and neighborhood. 16 The main focus of the original study was the effects of the interventions on child development. The sample size (64 supplemented or not, 64 stimulated or not) was determined for the developmental outcomes and gave 80% power at a 5% significance level to detect a benefit to development from either intervention of 0.5 s.d.…”
Section: Initial Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HOME questionnaire (Caldwell & Bradley, 1979) was developed in the United States and measures the responsiveness and stimulation of the home environment through a combination of systematic observations and maternal report. The HOME has been modified for use in Jamaica previously and was found to be associated with current and future development (Grantham-McGregor et al, 1991;Meeks-Gardner et al, 1999).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These behaviours are similar to those described in mothers of undernourished children and it is possible that the less stimulating behaviour of mothers of undernourished children is caused in part by poor psychosocial functioning. Mothers of undernourished children have been found to provide less stimulation in the home than mothers of adequately nourished children, the quality of maternalchild interaction has also been found to be poorer (Graves, 1976;Chavez & Martinez, 1982;Sigman et al, 1989;Grantham-McGregor et al, 1991;Meeks-Gardner et al, 1999;Pollitt et al, 2000) and their child is less likely to form a secure attachment (Valenzuela, 1990). These maternal behaviours have been found to be related to poor development in undernourished children (Chavez & Martinez, 1982;Sigman et al, 1989;Meeks-Gardner et al, 1999;Pollitt et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While genetics are likely a factor, environmental influences are also clearly playing a role. Impaired parental cognitive skills (possibly from their own history of malnutrition and lack of education) may lead to less food availability and less emphasis on intellectual stimulation in their children (Grantham-McGregor et al, 1991). Interestingly, intellectual stimulation has been shown to influence not only cognitive development but also physical growth (Super et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%