2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional status is related to heart failure severity and hospital readmissions in acute heart failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
64
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
64
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that all-cause death occurred more frequently in HFpEF patients with moderate or major nutrition-related risk than in those with low or no nutrition-related risk ( Table 3 and Model 4). [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] However, to our knowledge, all but one 18 of the previous studies reported on so-called HF patients, and therefore, our specific findings for 'HFpEF patients' are novel. The results of the present study indicate that screening nutritional status using a GNRI at discharge further refines risk assessment in patients hospitalized with HFpEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results showed that all-cause death occurred more frequently in HFpEF patients with moderate or major nutrition-related risk than in those with low or no nutrition-related risk ( Table 3 and Model 4). [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] However, to our knowledge, all but one 18 of the previous studies reported on so-called HF patients, and therefore, our specific findings for 'HFpEF patients' are novel. The results of the present study indicate that screening nutritional status using a GNRI at discharge further refines risk assessment in patients hospitalized with HFpEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In HF patients, undernutrition is not uncommon [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and represents one of the most significant determinants of poor clinical outcomes. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is a simple and well-established nutritional screening tool for elderly HF patients. [18][19][20] However, the predictive value of the assessment of nutritional status using GNRI in patients with HFpEF remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Also, the number of patients with heart failure (HF) is similarly increasing, and their high mortality and rates of readmission and increased medical expenses are becoming a problem. [4][5][6][7][8][9] In contrast, nutrition 10,11 in HF patients is a reported factor of mortality and readmission. In a report on the nutritional assessment of HF patients, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), which is measured using both serum albumin and body mass index (BMI), was shown to have excellent prognostic evaluation ability as compared with the measurement of serum albumin or BMI alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypoalbuminaemia present in malnourished patients could be associated with changes in vascular permeability and/or decreased cardiac mass and function. In fact, several studies have shown that malnutrition is common in patients with acute/chronic heart failure; associates with worse cardiac outcomes, including higher risk of mortality; and could add valuable prognostic information …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, several studies have shown that malnutrition is common in patients with acute/chronic heart failure; associates with worse cardiac outcomes, including higher risk of mortality; and could add valuable prognostic information. 14,16,22,23 There are studies demonstrating that high CRP levels and hypoalbuminaemia both independently and synergistically increased the risk of MACE in the long term in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. 24 The present study is the first to assess their impact in an acute setting and basically demonstrated similar deleterious effects of the two biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%