2013
DOI: 10.1159/000346038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Status Assessment of Institutionalized Elderly in Prague, Czech Republic

Abstract: Background: There are few studies in the Czech Republic describing and evaluating the nutritional status of institutionalized elderly. Methods: Data were collected from 659 women and 156 men aged 65 years and older and living in retirement homes in and around Prague. Data included: a Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA questionnaire), anthropometric measurements and biochemical evaluations. Results: According to the MNA questionnaire, 10.2% of these elderly individuals were malnourished and 39.4% were at risk of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(25 reference statements)
4
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Corroborating the present study, Rambousková et al 19 , in a study of elderly residents of an LTCF, found that malnutrition was positively correlated with weight loss in the previous 3 months (r=0.45, p<0.001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Corroborating the present study, Rambousková et al 19 , in a study of elderly residents of an LTCF, found that malnutrition was positively correlated with weight loss in the previous 3 months (r=0.45, p<0.001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this cross-sectional study, most of the participants were females (70.2%) and they were older than the males, which is similar to most studies carried out in elderly nursing home residents (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Weight was higher in males but BMI was higher in females, in part due to their lower height (which could be influenced by the higher age and the higher prevalence of osteoporosis in females).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Increased nutritional risk in males was 64.3% versus 45.5% in females ( = 0.16), and this was confirmed by MacLellan and van Til [24]. Contrarily, Rambousková et al [27] concluded that institutionalized women should be considered a nutritionally vulnerable population group; the reason for this difference may be the higher average age of women versus men (86.1 ± 6.15 versus 81.5 ± 7.97 years) in their study. Meanwhile, Fang et al [4] found no gender difference in the prevalence of nutritional risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%