2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional self-screening in <1 min: Evaluation of a measuring station using sonic measurement of height

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study in The Netherlands using two online screening tools found that approximately 57% of community-living older adults were at risk of malnutrition, thus, concluding that this easy access online screening could be useful to reach older adults at nutritional risk and could therefore, contribute to early identification and prevention [41]. Another recently published study by Elia et al used a device with sonic height measurement for nutritional self-screening of gastrointestinal outpatients, finding excellent agreement between HCPs screening and self-screening [42].…”
Section: Supporting Statements From the Csrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A recent study in The Netherlands using two online screening tools found that approximately 57% of community-living older adults were at risk of malnutrition, thus, concluding that this easy access online screening could be useful to reach older adults at nutritional risk and could therefore, contribute to early identification and prevention [41]. Another recently published study by Elia et al used a device with sonic height measurement for nutritional self-screening of gastrointestinal outpatients, finding excellent agreement between HCPs screening and self-screening [42].…”
Section: Supporting Statements From the Csrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Participants' body weight and heights were measured with the least possible clothing and barefooted using a stadiometer with the accuracy of 100 grs and 0.5 cm (Seca, Hamburg, Germany). Height was recorded while the individuals' heads were in Frankfurt position [ 17 ]. In addition, WC was measured at the midpoint of the abdomen located between the 12 th rib and the iliac crest using a nonstretching measuring tape [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the body weights and heights of participants were measured by a stadiometer (Seca, Germany, Model No: 222) with the accuracy of 0.1 kg and 0.1 cm while the individuals were in light clothes, barefooted, and kept their heads in Frankfurt position (Elia, Cawood, Akbar, & Smith, 2019). Moreover, a non-stretchable measuring tape was used to measure the waist circumference (Taylor, Keil, Gold, Williams, & Goulding, 1998).…”
Section: Anthropometrics and Blood Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%