Nutritional screening is strongly associated with overall survival in patients treated with targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Gu, Weijun; Zhang, Guiming; Sun, Lili; Ma, Qi; Cheng, Yufeng; Zhang, Ye; Shi, Guohai; Zhu, Yao; Ye, Dingwei

doi:10.1002/jcsm.12025

Cited by 67 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nutritional screening is critically important in order to identify patients in greatest need of nutritional therapy. This is further emphasized by recent findings that highlight the strong association between nutritional screening and survival prediction in oncology populations 71. In the USA, universal screening and assessment of malnutrition in hospitalized patients is mandatory within 24 h of admission 23, 24…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computed tomography diagnosed cachexia and sarcopenia in 725 oncology patients: is nutritional screening capturing hidden malnutrition?

Bhuachalla

Daly

Power

et al. 2017

J cachexia sarcopenia muscle

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundNutrition screening on admission to hospital is mandated in many countries, but to date, there is no consensus on which tool is optimal in the oncology setting. Wasting conditions such as cancer cachexia (CC) and sarcopenia are common in cancer patients and negatively impact on outcomes; however, they are often masked by excessive adiposity. This study aimed to inform the application of screening in cancer populations by investigating whether commonly used nutritional screening tools are adequately capturing nutritionally vulnerable patients, including those with abnormal body composition phenotypes (CC, sarcopenia, and myosteatosis).MethodsA prospective study of ambulatory oncology outpatients presenting for chemotherapy was performed. A detailed survey incorporating clinical, nutritional, biochemical, and quality of life data was administered. Participants were screened for malnutrition using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), and the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI). Computed tomography (CT) assessment of body composition was performed to diagnose CC, sarcopenia, and myosteatosis according to consensus criteria.ResultsA total of 725 patients (60% male, median age 64 years) with solid tumours participated (45% metastatic disease). The majority were overweight/obese (57%). However, 67% were losing weight, and CT analysis revealed CC in 42%, sarcopenia in 41%, and myosteatosis in 46%. Among patients with CT‐identified CC, the MUST, MST, and NRI tools categorized 27%, 35%, and 7% of them as ‘low nutritional risk’, respectively. The percentage of patients with CT‐identified sarcopenia and myosteatosis that were categorised as ‘low nutritional risk’ by MUST, MST and NRI were 55%, 61%, and 14% and 52%, 50%, and 11%, respectively. Among these tools, the NRI was most sensitive, with scores <97.5 detecting 85.8%, 88.6%, and 92.9% of sarcopenia, myosteatosis, and CC cases, respectively. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, NRI score < 97.5 predicted greater mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.8, confidence interval: 1.2–2.8, P = 0.007).ConclusionsHigh numbers of nutritionally vulnerable patients, with demonstrated abnormal body composition phenotypes on CT analysis, were misclassified by MUST and MST. Caution should be exercised when categorizing the nutritional risk of oncology patients using these tools. NRI detected the majority of abnormal body composition phenotypes and independently predicted survival. Of the tools examined, the NRI yielded the most valuable information from screening and demonstrated usefulness as an initial nutritional risk grading system in ambulatory oncology patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computed tomography diagnosed cachexia and sarcopenia in 725 oncology patients: is nutritional screening capturing hidden malnutrition?

Bhuachalla

Daly

Power

et al. 2017

J cachexia sarcopenia muscle

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition to sarcopenia and cachexia, other factors such as muscle attenuation have been shown to independently predict toxicity in gastrointestinal cancer . Although some studies have shown an association between performance status and nutritional screening tools in the prognosis of oncology patients, the studies did not show associations of these parameters with toxicities during chemotherapy. Thus, this study aimed to investigate which parameter of body composition, namely, low muscle mass or muscle attenuation, the presence of cachexia, nutritional status, or functional capacity, better predicts toxicity during chemotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is cachexia associated with chemotherapy toxicities in gastrointestinal cancer patients? A prospective study

Rocha

Marcadenti

Medeiros

et al. 2019

J cachexia sarcopenia muscle

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Chemotherapy is an effective treatment with good clinical response in patients with cancer. However, it can cause exacerbated toxicities in patients and consequently change the course of treatment. Some factors may interfere with this toxicity such as body composition, especially in gastrointestinal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of body composition, nutritional status, and functional capacity scale in predicting the occurrence of toxicities in gastrointestinal cancer patients during chemotherapy treatment. Methods This is a prospective study with gastrointestinal cancer patients at the beginning of chemotherapy treatment. Sarcopenia and muscle attenuation were assessed using the skeletal muscle index from computerized tomography by measuring cross‐sectional areas of the L3 tissue (cm 2 /m 2 ). Cachexia was graded according to involuntary weight loss associated with sarcopenia. Nutritional status was assessed by using anthropometric evaluation and Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Functional capacity was evaluated by handgrip strength and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status scale. Haematological gastrointestinal and dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. The associations among sarcopenia, cachexia, nutritional status, and functional capacity with DLT were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression model. Results A total of 60 patients were evaluated (55% male, 60.9 ± 14.0 years) and followed up for a mean of 55 days. Most patients had normal weight (44.2%) and good ECOG Performance Status (≤1) at baseline (78%). During the chemotherapy period, the most prevalent toxicities were diarrhoea, nausea, and anorexia, but the presence of DLT was similar between cycles ( P > 0.05). Cachexia was associated with a higher toxicity manifested by diarrhoea ( P = 0.02), nausea ( P = 0.02), and anorexia ( P < 0.01 and P = 0.03 at Cycles 1 and 2, respectively). Sarcopenic and cachetic individuals experienced more toxicities and DLT during chemotherapy. The only factors associated with DLT in the multivariate Cox regression analyses including the presence of metastasis and the chemotherapy protocol were cachexia and the ECOG scale ( P < 0.001 for both). Conclusions Cachexia and ECOG score may identify patients with an increased risk for developing severe toxicity events during chemotherapy treatment for gastrointestinal cancer.

show abstract

“…35, 36, 55 However, polypharmacy was not consistently included as part of the GA, which may be due to studies showing mixed results in the correlation between polypharmacy and various clinical outcomes, compared to strong correlations noted in other GA domains such as comorbidities, functional and nutritional status. 33, 56-59 For studies that did include medication assessment, the data was often analyzed and presented as number of medications. For example, Joly at al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use in geriatric oncology

Sharma

Loh

Nightingale

et al. 2016

Journal of Geriatric Oncology

169

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Polypharmacy is a highly prevalent problem in older persons, and is challenging to assess and improve due to variations in definitions of the problem and the heterogeneous methods of medication review and reduction. The purpose of this review is to summarize evidence regarding the prevalence and impact of polypharmacy in geriatric oncology patients and to provide recommendations for assessment and management. Polypharmacy has somewhat variably been incorporated into geriatric assessment studies in geriatric oncology, and polypharmacy has not been consistently evaluated as a predictor of negative outcomes in patients with cancer. Once screened, interventions for polypharmacy are even more uncertain. There is a great need to create standardized interventions to improve polypharmacy in geriatrics, and particularly in geriatric oncology. The process of deprescribing is aimed at reducing medications for which real or potential harm outweighs benefit, and there are numerous methods to determine which medications are candidates for deprescribing. However, deprescribing approaches have not been evaluated in older patients with cancer. Ultimately, methods to identify polypharmacy will need to be clearly defined and validated, and interventions to improve medication use will need to be based on clearly defined and standardized methods.

show abstract

Nutritional screening is strongly associated with overall survival in patients treated with targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Cited by 67 publications

References 27 publications

Computed tomography diagnosed cachexia and sarcopenia in 725 oncology patients: is nutritional screening capturing hidden malnutrition?

Computed tomography diagnosed cachexia and sarcopenia in 725 oncology patients: is nutritional screening capturing hidden malnutrition?

Is cachexia associated with chemotherapy toxicities in gastrointestinal cancer patients? A prospective study

Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use in geriatric oncology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About