1996
DOI: 10.1079/nrr19960004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Implications Of Resistant Starch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
129
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects of NSP and RS on activity-related energy expenditure have been attributed to fermentation processes (Schrama and Bakker, 1999). In contrast with the rapid digestion of enzymatically degradable starch, fermentation of RS may continue for many hours after feeding, resulting in a more gradual supply of energy (Asp et al, 1996;Van der Meulen et al, 1997). In our study, this was reflected in the distinct circadian patterns in RQ and heat production of pigs on the two different diets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Effects of NSP and RS on activity-related energy expenditure have been attributed to fermentation processes (Schrama and Bakker, 1999). In contrast with the rapid digestion of enzymatically degradable starch, fermentation of RS may continue for many hours after feeding, resulting in a more gradual supply of energy (Asp et al, 1996;Van der Meulen et al, 1997). In our study, this was reflected in the distinct circadian patterns in RQ and heat production of pigs on the two different diets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…RS is defined as the starch or starch degradation products which are not absorbed in the small intestine of healthy individuals (Berry, 1986;Asp et al 1996). RS is a major substrate for colonic fermentation and a good source of butyrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the viscosity of the solutions prior to ingestion does not seem to equate to the intensity of physiological effect (El Kossori et al, 2000) and the effects can be diminished when there is greater bulk in the diet (Giacco et al, 1998). Insoluble and intact plant cell-walls may hold together particles too large for nutrients to escape from them (Asp et al, 1996). The relative importance of these two potential mechanisms is not clear, although there are positive effects on glycaemic indices (Ha et al, 1992) and glycaemic control (Wolever et al, 1991) as well as favourable blood lipid modulation (Brown et al, 1999).…”
Section: Site Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%