Abstract:The effect on the protein quality of meat meals of processing them under commercial conditions in a continuous dry renderer at maximum temperatures ranging from 116 to 160°C for a running time of 115 min was studied. Although the total levels of amino acids were little affected by processing temperatures, the biological availability of all essential amino acids, as determined by the protozoan Tetrahymena pyriformis, was reduced as the processing temperature increased. At 140 and 160°C the availability of certa… Show more
“…Average total essential and non-essential amino acids content of processed samples (34.6% and 52.7% CP) was similar to that found by Hendriks et al (2002) in 94 MBM samples (36.2% and 60.7% CP). In addition, the concentrations of essential and non-essential amino acids agree with the Degussa database (AminoDataÒ 3.0; Evonik Degussa GmbH, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany) of 377 MBM samples and are similar to the ranges reported in the literature (Kondos and McClymont, 1972;Hendriks et al, 2002).…”
Section: Protein Qualitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous works have shown that when proteins are processed with heat or pressurized steam, amino acids may be destroyed and/or altered and thus become unavailable to animals′ metabolism (Kondos and McClymont, 1972; Wang and Parsons, 1998). Although, the exact mechanisms by which heat and pressure affect amino acids concentration are unknown, the reason may be associated with racemization or cross‐linking of amino acids (Singh, 1991; Shirley and Parsons, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides lysine and methionine, other essential amino acids, such as threonine, leucine, valine and phenylalanine, were also affected by the rendering process. Kondos and McClymont (1972) studied the effect of different commercial processing conditions (from 116 °C to 160 °C) on the protein quality of meat meals. Lysine, histidine, methionine and arginine were the most severely affected as temperature was increased beyond 140 °C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw material (Skurray and Herbert, 1974; Johnson and Parsons, 1997; Shirley and Parsons, 2000) and processing conditions (Kondos and McClymont, 1972; Wang and Parsons, 1998; Shirley and Parsons, 2000) have been shown to affect the protein quality of animal meals. Hence, the simultaneous changes in raw material and technological process are likely to have a large influence on the protein value of current MBM.…”
This work studies the effect of rendering on quality of meat and bone meals (MBM) processed in two Spanish rendering plants according to the standard procedure recommended by 96/499/EC Directive for MBM category III. Twelve samples of raw animal by-products and their corresponding meals were analysed for chemical composition, amino acids (AA) content, FDNB-reactive lysine content, pepsin digestibility, protein dispersibility index (PDI) and fatty acids (FA) content. There was a high variation in MBM composition between and within plants, mainly in the ash and fat content. Rendering caused a decrease in the total (p < 0.05) and the essential (p < 0.01) AA content (in crude protein basis) in both plants, because of a decrease in lysine (p < 0.001), methionine (p < 0.05), threonine (p < 0.01), leucine (p < 0.01), valine (p < 0.01) and phenylalanine (p < 0.01). Besides, there was a reduction in the cystine (p < 0.001), serine (p < 0.01) and aspartic acid (p < 0.01) content. The FDNB-reactive lysine to total lysine ratio and pepsin digestibility only decreased (p < 0.001) in the plant with more severe treatment conditions, whereas the PDI increased (p < 0.05) by the process in both plants. The saturated to unsaturated FA ratio increase on average from 0.73 to 0.88 after rendering, because of the decrease in both linoleic and linolenic acids content and the increase in palmitic and stearic acids content. The results indicate that rendering has negative effects on protein and fat quality of MBM. Variability between and within plants is attributed to differences in raw material, processing conditions and fat removing efficiency. Therefore, a continuous monitoring is recommended to assure the quality of each batch before use.
“…Average total essential and non-essential amino acids content of processed samples (34.6% and 52.7% CP) was similar to that found by Hendriks et al (2002) in 94 MBM samples (36.2% and 60.7% CP). In addition, the concentrations of essential and non-essential amino acids agree with the Degussa database (AminoDataÒ 3.0; Evonik Degussa GmbH, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany) of 377 MBM samples and are similar to the ranges reported in the literature (Kondos and McClymont, 1972;Hendriks et al, 2002).…”
Section: Protein Qualitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous works have shown that when proteins are processed with heat or pressurized steam, amino acids may be destroyed and/or altered and thus become unavailable to animals′ metabolism (Kondos and McClymont, 1972; Wang and Parsons, 1998). Although, the exact mechanisms by which heat and pressure affect amino acids concentration are unknown, the reason may be associated with racemization or cross‐linking of amino acids (Singh, 1991; Shirley and Parsons, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides lysine and methionine, other essential amino acids, such as threonine, leucine, valine and phenylalanine, were also affected by the rendering process. Kondos and McClymont (1972) studied the effect of different commercial processing conditions (from 116 °C to 160 °C) on the protein quality of meat meals. Lysine, histidine, methionine and arginine were the most severely affected as temperature was increased beyond 140 °C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw material (Skurray and Herbert, 1974; Johnson and Parsons, 1997; Shirley and Parsons, 2000) and processing conditions (Kondos and McClymont, 1972; Wang and Parsons, 1998; Shirley and Parsons, 2000) have been shown to affect the protein quality of animal meals. Hence, the simultaneous changes in raw material and technological process are likely to have a large influence on the protein value of current MBM.…”
This work studies the effect of rendering on quality of meat and bone meals (MBM) processed in two Spanish rendering plants according to the standard procedure recommended by 96/499/EC Directive for MBM category III. Twelve samples of raw animal by-products and their corresponding meals were analysed for chemical composition, amino acids (AA) content, FDNB-reactive lysine content, pepsin digestibility, protein dispersibility index (PDI) and fatty acids (FA) content. There was a high variation in MBM composition between and within plants, mainly in the ash and fat content. Rendering caused a decrease in the total (p < 0.05) and the essential (p < 0.01) AA content (in crude protein basis) in both plants, because of a decrease in lysine (p < 0.001), methionine (p < 0.05), threonine (p < 0.01), leucine (p < 0.01), valine (p < 0.01) and phenylalanine (p < 0.01). Besides, there was a reduction in the cystine (p < 0.001), serine (p < 0.01) and aspartic acid (p < 0.01) content. The FDNB-reactive lysine to total lysine ratio and pepsin digestibility only decreased (p < 0.001) in the plant with more severe treatment conditions, whereas the PDI increased (p < 0.05) by the process in both plants. The saturated to unsaturated FA ratio increase on average from 0.73 to 0.88 after rendering, because of the decrease in both linoleic and linolenic acids content and the increase in palmitic and stearic acids content. The results indicate that rendering has negative effects on protein and fat quality of MBM. Variability between and within plants is attributed to differences in raw material, processing conditions and fat removing efficiency. Therefore, a continuous monitoring is recommended to assure the quality of each batch before use.
“…In contrast, processing temperature has been shown to greatly affect digestibility of AA in animal meals. Kondos and McClymont (1972) reported that the availability of the essential AA in MBM decreased markedly when the processing temperature was increased from 116 to 160°C. In addition, Batterham et al (1986) found that lysine availability in MBM for chicks decreased from 85 to 35% when the processing temperature increased from 125 to 150°C.…”
We conducted experiments to determine amino acid (AA) digestibility of nine animal by-product meals using precision-fed cecectomized roosters and ileally cannulated dogs. The products initially evaluated in roosters were meat and bone meals (MBM) containing 24 or 34% ash, poultry by-product meals (PBP) containing 7 or 16% ash, lamb meals (LM) containing 15 or 24% ash, a LM analog containing a mixture of LM and turkey meal, and two MBM processed at either a low or high temperature. The MBM and PBP differing in ash, low-ash LM, and low-temperature MBM then were incorporated into extruded dry dog foods and evaluated in cecectomized roosters and ileally cannulated dogs. True digestibility of total AA in roosters averaged 76% for the nine meals fed alone, with the low-temperature MBM being highest at 84% and the low-ash LM being lowest at 66% (P < .05). No consistent differences in rooster AA digestibility were observed between pairs of meals differing in ash content. Digestibilities of AA were higher in the low-temperature MBM than in the high-temperature MBM. Differences in rooster AA digestibility values among the six extruded dog foods containing selected animal meals were similar to those observed when the animal meals were fed alone. The ileally cannulated dog assay yielded results for AA digestibilities that were highly correlated (r = .87 to .92) with those of the rooster assay, whereby the high-ash MBM and low-temperature MBM foods had the highest mean AA digestibility at 82% and the low-ash LM food had the lowest mean AA digestibility at 62% (P < .05). Again, no consistent differences in AA digestibilities for dogs were observed between pairs of dog foods containing MBM or PBP differing in ash content. Results of this study indicated that processing temperature influenced AA digestibility of MBM, but species raw material source and ash content had no consistent effect on AA digestibility. Results also indicated that the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay could be used to predict differences in AA digestibility among animal by-product meals for dogs.
A series of experiments was performed to verify the suitability of the protozoon Tetrahymena pyriformis (T.P.) for determining the lysine availability of feeds. The multiplication rate was estimated with the aid of organism counting, turbidimetry and reduction of triphenyltetrazolium chloride. The volume of T.P. was calculated on the basis of length and breadth measurements, Within higher rates of multiplication, there was connected a tendency towards larger organism volumes. A comparison of the growth tests showed that only turbidimetry is able to reflect, under certain conditions, the efficiency of the test organism in protein synthesis. The values for lysine availability varied widely according to the kind and pretreatment of the feedstuff, but did in no case attain those obtained with animal experiments. T.P. is, therefore, scarcely suited as a test organism for determining the protein quality and amino-acid availability of feedstuffs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.