1989
DOI: 10.1079/pns19890012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional ecology of the wild rabbit—an input to the timing of reproduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The season had a significant effect (P<0.001) on GL, while farm and parity had no statistical effect on GL The interaction between these factors did not affect on GL and LS, so there is no discussion about the interaction. The results of the analysis were in agreement with the studies reported by Boyd and Bray (1989); Ferraz et al (1991) and Farghaly, (1996) who stated that the reproduction of rabbits was influenced by the seasons which has an impact on gestation and lactation of female rabbit. Lebas et al (1986), reported that season is of the external factors that play a role in the physiological and reproductive conditions of female rabbits.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The season had a significant effect (P<0.001) on GL, while farm and parity had no statistical effect on GL The interaction between these factors did not affect on GL and LS, so there is no discussion about the interaction. The results of the analysis were in agreement with the studies reported by Boyd and Bray (1989); Ferraz et al (1991) and Farghaly, (1996) who stated that the reproduction of rabbits was influenced by the seasons which has an impact on gestation and lactation of female rabbit. Lebas et al (1986), reported that season is of the external factors that play a role in the physiological and reproductive conditions of female rabbits.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the most relevant factor related to reproduction seasonality seems to be nutrition. Changes in food supply are particularly relevant for wild rabbits living in highly localised social groups [ 78 ]. This reproductive adaptation of the rabbit is worth noting, as the appearance of offspring is avoided in periods with limited food availability, thus leading to low survival rates.…”
Section: Reproduction In Rabbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El contenido de PC varía de 4.77 a 5.46 %, lo cual concuerda con lo reportado por McDowell et al (1974) quienes analizaron 16 tipos de Muhlenbergia. En este sentido, se ha reportado que la proteína del hábitat puede incidir en la dinámica poblacional; a una condición mejor de PC se mejora la densidad poblacional de otras especies como Oryctolagus cuniculus (Boyd & Bray, 1989) y Sylvilagus floridanus (Lochmiller, Peitz, Leslie, & Engle, 1995). En el caso del conejo de los volcanes, se esperaría que cuente con procesos como la cecotrofia, que contribuya significativamente en la nutrición (Cervantes et al, 1990).…”
Section: Sitiounclassified
“…CP content varies from 4.77 to 5.46 %, which is consistent with that reported by McDowell et al (1974) who analyzed 16 types of Muhlenbergia. In this regard, it has been reported that the protein in a habitat may affect population dynamics, as a better CP condition improves the population density of other species such as Oryctolagus cuniculus (Boyd & Bray, 1989) and Sylvilagus floridanus (Lochmiller, Peitz Leslie, & Engle, 1995). In the case of the volcano rabbit, one would expect it to make use of processes such as caecotrophy, which contributes significantly to nutrition (Cervantes et al, 1990).…”
Section: Sitiomentioning
confidence: 99%