“…However, many controver sies arise around the possible disorders caused by low-level exposure (not resulting in detectable thermal effects) to MW fields [2,7,17,18,26,29]. There exists a general agree ment that these disorders may involve func tional disintegrations (due to specific action of MWs or to nonspecific stress reactions of the exposed dams), which are manifested only postnatally [13,21], with decreased fetal and neonatal mass being one of the most con sistent effects of the intrauterine exposure [2,3], Therefore, until now, MWs have not gained much interest as a teratogenic agent as neither malformations, increased number of resorptions, nor disorders in development of preimplantation embryos were documented after exposure to nonthermal MW fields [3,5,16,17,22], However, the consistently noted lowering of fetal mass is considered by some authors [15] as an important index of neonatal condition, representing a more se vere demonstration of the teratogenic poten tial of MWs than would only the delayed growth of the fetus [3],…”