1985
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1011509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Considerations in Cystic Fibrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children who participated in the clinical trial experienced an average decline of 0.05 in their BMI z -score over 27 months, whereas the Comparison Sample declined four times as much during the same period. While there is no corresponding CFF Registry data on caloric intake, numerous studies have reported that the typical intake of children with CF is about 100% of the recommended energy for children 1821 rather than the 120–150% recommended for CF 22,23 and achieved by children who received the intensive intervention provided in the clinical trial. 12 Thus, our data suggests that standard of care, as it was being delivered during the time of the study was not achieving optimal growth outcomes in comparison to what could be achieved with more intensive and structured interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children who participated in the clinical trial experienced an average decline of 0.05 in their BMI z -score over 27 months, whereas the Comparison Sample declined four times as much during the same period. While there is no corresponding CFF Registry data on caloric intake, numerous studies have reported that the typical intake of children with CF is about 100% of the recommended energy for children 1821 rather than the 120–150% recommended for CF 22,23 and achieved by children who received the intensive intervention provided in the clinical trial. 12 Thus, our data suggests that standard of care, as it was being delivered during the time of the study was not achieving optimal growth outcomes in comparison to what could be achieved with more intensive and structured interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work has suggested that malabsorption alone cannot explain the altered fatty acid status in CF patients and that total calorie intake relative to caloric need may be the most important determinant of measured deficiences. 23 Rapid correction of deficiencies with intravenous fat infusions may permit a normalization, a new baseline from which normal levels can then be maintained via oral sources. Further work is required in this area to document the specific advantages of normal linoleic acid levels for CF patients.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%