2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.afres.2022.100233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional composition and sensory characteristics of breast meat from different chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained by Devatkal et al (2019) also found no differences in the percentages of moisture, ash, and total fat when comparing the meats of different chicken genotypes with different growth rates, although they did observe differences in crude protein content, with higher levels for slow-growing chicks, but with these values being lower than those obtained in the present study. In contrast, in the work of Hailemariam et al (2022) , variations were found in the percentages of moisture, crude protein, and ash when using different genotypes, obtaining values similar to our results with the Improved Horro and Indigenous genotypes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained by Devatkal et al (2019) also found no differences in the percentages of moisture, ash, and total fat when comparing the meats of different chicken genotypes with different growth rates, although they did observe differences in crude protein content, with higher levels for slow-growing chicks, but with these values being lower than those obtained in the present study. In contrast, in the work of Hailemariam et al (2022) , variations were found in the percentages of moisture, crude protein, and ash when using different genotypes, obtaining values similar to our results with the Improved Horro and Indigenous genotypes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, these alternative models typically employ slow-growing chicken strains, thereby honoring the natural growth cycle of the birds ( Nieto et al, 2023 b ). This practice leads to notable nutritional and organoleptic quality disparities compared to industrial chicken strains ( Jaturasitha et al, 2008 ; Hailemariam et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of consistency could be due to the great variability of factors influencing meat chemical composition, as the ash proportion is influenced by genotype, sex, age, rearing system, and nutrition ( 146 ). The aforementioned variables (fat and ash) showed negative correlations with moisture (−0.375 and −0.498, respectively), which is supported by literature ( 144 , 147 , 148 ), which could be attached to the fact that greater fatty muscles repulse moisture due to their low solubility ( 147 ). Fat was also found to be negatively associated with protein (−0.460), which is reinforced by previous authors ( 149 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Regarding these traits, contradictory results are found in the bibliography. A positive association between traits has been described (144), and parallel tendencies of variables were reported when comparing turkey genotypes (8) and rearing systems (7). On the other hand, a negative correlation (144) and no correlation (145) among traits have been reported as well.…”
Section: Meat and Carcass Quality-related Traits Correlationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Meat yield are critical factors in determining the commercial value of broiler chick carcasses, with a particular focus on parts like breast muscle and leg muscle ( Santoso et al, 2015 ). Chicken meat is well-known for its high protein content ( Hailemariam et al, 2022 ), and, as such, dietary protein intake and utilization are closely linked to meat yield. Serum albumin and total protein levels serve as valuable indicators that provide insights into protein intake and utilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%