2013
DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.1.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Characteristics and Quality Changes of Duck By-products During Frozen Storage at -20℃

Abstract: The objective of this study is to increase the utilization of duck by-products. The nutritional characteristics of four kinds of duck by-products (liver, heart, gizzard, and feet) were determined. The quality changes of four kinds of duck by-products were evaluated during frozen storage at -20 o C. The crude protein and cholesterol contents showed the highest level in liver while the crude fat content was determined to be the highest content in feet at 13.90%, and lowest in gizzard at 0.57%. Duck by-products c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to these results, no significant differences were observed in dry matter, total protein, and fat content between gizzards from chickens from organic and conventional production systems (Abdullah and Buchtová 2016). Comparing our results for C duck gizzards with the results published by Ku et al (2013), the protein percentage was lower (18.67 vs. 20.20), while the ratio of the dry matter (23.17 vs. 21.68), fat (0.59 vs. 0.57) and ash (0.99 vs. 0.90) content was higher.…”
Section: Chemical Compositioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…In contrast to these results, no significant differences were observed in dry matter, total protein, and fat content between gizzards from chickens from organic and conventional production systems (Abdullah and Buchtová 2016). Comparing our results for C duck gizzards with the results published by Ku et al (2013), the protein percentage was lower (18.67 vs. 20.20), while the ratio of the dry matter (23.17 vs. 21.68), fat (0.59 vs. 0.57) and ash (0.99 vs. 0.90) content was higher.…”
Section: Chemical Compositioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…중대한 영향을 미치게 된다 [5,14]. 항산화제는 활성산소와 반 응하여 생체 손상을 최소화하거나 억제하는 물질이지만 그 중 합성 항산화제의 경우 인체에 발암과 같은 부작용이 보고 되고 있다 [25].…”
unclassified