1988
DOI: 10.1177/0148607188012003299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrition, operations, and intestinal adaptation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Enteroglucagon plays a major role in modulating the compensatory hyperplasia seen in the remaining small bowel after partial enterectomy (Bristol & Williamson, 1988). The duodenum participates in this adaptive response to proximal small bowel resection (Williamson & Bauer, 1978;Urban et (Stewart et al, 1991), probably because severe weight loss and malabsorption suppressed carcinogenesis (Roebuck et al, 1981b).…”
Section: Other Specific Dietary Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enteroglucagon plays a major role in modulating the compensatory hyperplasia seen in the remaining small bowel after partial enterectomy (Bristol & Williamson, 1988). The duodenum participates in this adaptive response to proximal small bowel resection (Williamson & Bauer, 1978;Urban et (Stewart et al, 1991), probably because severe weight loss and malabsorption suppressed carcinogenesis (Roebuck et al, 1981b).…”
Section: Other Specific Dietary Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the rodent model of massive small bowel resection (SBR), the residual small intestine (both jejunum and/or ileum) undergoes a series of adaptive processes leading to a significant increase in intestinal absorptive surface area which reflects regulatory processes for reestablishment of the nutritional homeostasis of the body the exact mechanisms of which are still poorly understood (3)(4)(5). The degree of intestinal adaptation has been shown to depend on the amount of the resected tissue and also on the site of intestinal resection (6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tube feeding (TF) is to be preferred over parenteral nutrition (PN) provided the alimentary tract is functional, because of its more physiological character. It helps to maintain the integrity of the gastrointestinal tract, reduces potential bacterial translocation, and is associated with minimal complications [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Furthermore, TF is relatively inexpensive compared to PN [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%