Nutrition education and cooking workshops for families of children with cancer: a feasibility study

Abstract

Background: Changes in food intake are common in children with cancer and are often caused by nausea and perturbations in sense of taste. The VIE (Valorization, Implication, Education) study proposes family-based nutrition and cooking education workshops during childhood cancer treatments. Process evaluation during implementation allows to assess if the intervention was delivered as planned and to determine its barriers and facilitators. The study objective was to describe the implementation process of a nutrition education and cooking workshop program for families of children actively treated for cancer in a non-randomized non-controlled feasibility study. Methods: Six open-to-all in-hospital workshops were offered on a weekly basis during a one-year implementation phase. We collected qualitative and quantitative data using field notes and activity reports completed by the registered dietician facilitator; surveys and questionnaires fulfilled by the workshop participants and by the families enrolled in the VIE study. Field notes were used to collect only qualitative data. Survey respondents (n = 26) were mostly mothers (n = 19, 73%). Children's mean age was 7.80 (± 4.99) years and the mean time since diagnosis was 7.98 (± 0.81) months. Qualitative data were codified using hybrid content analysis. The first deductive analysis was based on the Steckler & Linnan concepts. Subthemes were then identified inductively. Quantitative data were presented with descriptive statistics. Results: Workshop attendance was low (17 participants over 1 year) and 71% of the planned workshops were cancelled due to lack of participants. The principal barriers to participation referred the child's medical condition, parental presence required at the child's bedside and challenges related to logistics and time management. The level of interest in the topics addressed was found high or very high for 92% of the participants. The themes that were perceived as the most useful by parents were related to the child's specific medical condition. Conclusions: Despite high interest, workshops delivered in a face-to-face format were poorly feasible in our sample population. This supports the need to develop educational programs in pediatric oncology using strategies and delivery formats that address the major barriers for participation encountered by families.

The impact of changes in taste, smell, and eating behavior in children with cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A qualitative study

“…Further research should focus on how children and parents want to be supported on this topic. Interestingly, a recent feasibility study investigating nutrition education and cooking workshops for families of children with cancer, showed that the workshop "changes in taste during cancer therapy" was most useful to parents (18). This underscores how much difficulty parents and children have with taste changes and that providing ways to deal with these changes is very valuable.…”

Unique Features of a Web-Based Nutrition Website for Childhood Cancer Populations: Descriptive Study

“…However, patients and families could face barriers to participating in in-person interventions. Beaulieu-Gagnon et al [ 41 ] identified common barriers faced by patients with childhood cancer in attending face-to-face nutrition classes. Notably, low attendance (17 participants over 1 year) resulted in the cancelation of 71% of their healthy cooking courses.…”

Adherence to dietary recommendations by children and adolescents during steroid therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

“…Children with cancer are more prone to malnutrition and excessive weight gain during treatment [23]. The use of corticosteroids may lead to a higher consumption of high-energy products [6,17].…”

“…Dzieci chore na nowotwory są bardziej narażone na niedożywienie i nadmierny przyrost masy ciała podczas leczenia [23]. Stosowanie kortykosteroidów może prowadzić do większego spożycia produktów wysokoenergetycznych [6,17].…”