2014
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrition economic evaluation of a probiotic in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea

Abstract: Introduction: Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) is common and frequently more severe in hospitalized elderly adults. It can lead to increased use of healthcare resources. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of a fermented milk (FM) with probiotic in preventing AAD and in particular Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD).Methods: Clinical effectiveness data and cost information were incorporated in a model to estimate the cost impact of administering a FM containing the probiotic Lactobacillus para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One costÀbenefit analysis conducted in the United Kingdom evaluated the use of Lactobacillus paracasei in hospitalized adults older than 65 years who were taking antibiotics and estimated a cost savings of >$500 per patient treated (£339). 52 Similarly, a recent study from Canada concluded that probiotic use would also be cost saving in the Canadian health system. 53 Uncertainties about the optimal probiotic formulation, dose, duration, and commercial source prevent specific clear practical recommendations.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One costÀbenefit analysis conducted in the United Kingdom evaluated the use of Lactobacillus paracasei in hospitalized adults older than 65 years who were taking antibiotics and estimated a cost savings of >$500 per patient treated (£339). 52 Similarly, a recent study from Canada concluded that probiotic use would also be cost saving in the Canadian health system. 53 Uncertainties about the optimal probiotic formulation, dose, duration, and commercial source prevent specific clear practical recommendations.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,36,40 Furthermore, numerous clinical studies have reported therapeutic efficacy with the use of D(¡), L(C) and DL-Lactic acid producing bacteria without producing D-Lactic acidosis ( Table 2). [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] The misinterpretation of D-Lactate producing bacteria has created an almost deliberate atmosphere of scientific nonsense regarding D(¡)-Lactate producing probiotics. The net result has some industry suppliers of probiotic formulations hastening to deliver D-Lactate free probiotic formulations together with a misinformed marketing hype that misleads and confuses healthcare practitioners and the public, for nothing more than monetary gain.…”
Section: D(¡)-lactate Producing Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of trials show a positive effect of probiotics in the treatment of various diseases and disorders, e.g. atopic dermatitis [5], irritable bowel syndrome [6, 7], ulcerative colitis [8] and antibiotic-associated diarrhea[9]. Even preterm neonates are medicated with probiotics to prevent infections [1012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%