2016
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2015.741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient uptake in a suspension of squirmers

Abstract: Nutrient uptake is one of the most important factors in cell growth. Despite the biological importance, little is known about the effect of cell-cell hydrodynamic interactions on nutrient uptake in a suspension of swimming micro-organisms. In this study, we numerically investigate the nutrient uptake in an infinite suspension of squirmers. In the dilute limit, our results are in good agreement with a previous study by Magar et al. (Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths, vol. 56, 2003, pp. 65-91). When we increased the volum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Squirming enhanced uptake compared to that of a rigid sphere moving at the same speed. Ishikawa et al (2016) extended the analysis to squirmer suspensions; nutrient uptake increased in a quadratic manner to volume fractions of up to 30 %. The squirmer model has also been used to study bioconvection in suspensions of upswimming cells, which generate gravitational instability (Kessler 1986;Ishikawa, Locsei & Pedley 2008;Evans et al 2011), and to explore the coherent structures of non-gravitational active swimmers (Simha & Ramaswamy 2002;Saintillan & Shelley 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Squirming enhanced uptake compared to that of a rigid sphere moving at the same speed. Ishikawa et al (2016) extended the analysis to squirmer suspensions; nutrient uptake increased in a quadratic manner to volume fractions of up to 30 %. The squirmer model has also been used to study bioconvection in suspensions of upswimming cells, which generate gravitational instability (Kessler 1986;Ishikawa, Locsei & Pedley 2008;Evans et al 2011), and to explore the coherent structures of non-gravitational active swimmers (Simha & Ramaswamy 2002;Saintillan & Shelley 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For swimming microorganisms, many interactions hinge on close contact. These include fundamental processes like nutrient uptake [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]; viral and fungal infection of microorganisms of ecological and commercial importance [32][33][34], eukaryotic fertilisation [35]; and grazing, which happens on natural preys [30,[36][37][38] as well as marine microplastics [39,40], and is recently being discovered as a fundamental behaviour in many strains of motile green algae until recently regarded as exclusive phototrophs [34,41,42]. With the exception of complex feeding currents in ciliates like Vorticella [43,44] or Paramecium [45,46], the window of opportunity for these microbial interactions to take place will depend on a finite contact time T .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle motion was then determined by the advection velocity calculated using equation (2.1) and diffusion due to Brownian motion. In the same manner as described previously [31], the positions of particles, x p , were updated by xpfalse(t+normalΔtfalse)=xpfalse(tfalse)+tt+normalΔtvpfalse(tfalse)dt+rBfalse(normalΔtfalse),where r B is the displacement due to Brownian motion, the variance of which is determined by the Péclet number. To discuss flow-dominant particle transportation, we used a Pe of a  = 1 μm, throughout this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%