2018
DOI: 10.1080/17518369.2018.1440107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient uptake controls and limitation dynamics in north-east Greenland streams

Abstract: Permafrost thaw induced by climate change will cause increased release of nutrients and organic matter from the active layer to Arctic streams and, with increased water temperature, will potentially enhance algal biomass and nutrient uptake. Although essential for accurately predicting the response of Arctic streams to environmental change, knowledge of nutrient release on current Arctic in-stream processing is limited. Addressing this research gap, we quantified nutrient uptake of short-term releases of NO 3 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, in our study a negative response to single nutrient amendments was found for both autotrophic and total biofilm biomass, which contrasts the results of early summer investigations conducted in the same streams where increased chl a with N addition was recorded (Docherty, Riis, Hannah, et al, 2018). Nutrient inhibition of growth has previously been observed in NDS research worldwide (Beck et al, 2017; Francoeur, 2001) and for Arctic studies (Figure S5), but the mechanisms behind remain equivocal.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In general, in our study a negative response to single nutrient amendments was found for both autotrophic and total biofilm biomass, which contrasts the results of early summer investigations conducted in the same streams where increased chl a with N addition was recorded (Docherty, Riis, Hannah, et al, 2018). Nutrient inhibition of growth has previously been observed in NDS research worldwide (Beck et al, 2017; Francoeur, 2001) and for Arctic studies (Figure S5), but the mechanisms behind remain equivocal.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, high biomass values were recorded at the upstream sites, especially for the autotrophic fraction with the highest chl a values occurring at the Kærelv A site (1.6–4.1 μg chl a /cm 2 on control disks). The values are conspicuously high compared with those recorded for unamended inorganic substrates in other NDS studies in the Arctic region (Table S3), including the same downstream reaches (C sites) sampled during early summer (0.33 and 0.79 μg chl a /cm 2 ; Docherty, Riis, Hannah, et al, 2018). Concurrently with the large variability in biofilm biomass, we found large variation in water N concentrations among the six sampled stream reaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The high variability in conductivity and solute load between sites is representative of the different levels of fluvial erosion and nivation processes taking place at each site (Hasholt & Hagedorn, 2000), leading to high suspended sediment concentrations in streams, which are then weathered in-stream by turbulent flow, releasing ions and nutrients (Chin et al, 2016). Previous research has shown all streams in this study to have low nutrient and dissolved organic carbon concentrations and low primary producer biomass, with nutrient uptake being low as a result (Docherty, Riis, Hannah, Rosenhøj Leth, & Milner, 2018).…”
Section: Variation In Environmental Habitat Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 80%