2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient sequestration potential of water primrose Ludwigia stolinefera (Guill. & Perr.) P.H. Raven: A strategy for restoring wetland eutrophication

Abstract: The current work investigates the capacity of the water primrose ( Ludwigia stolinefera ) to sequester inorganic and organic nutrients in its biomass to restore eutrophic wetlands, besides its nutritive quality as fodder for animals. The nutrient elements and nutritive value of the water primrose were assessed seasonally in polluted and unpolluted watercourses. The water primrose plants’ highest biomass was attained during summer; then, it was significantly reduced till it reached its lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated TDN values of V. cuspidata of this study (67.12 -68.16%, Table 3) are higher than the values in the shoots of the two aquatic plants E. crassipes (54.2%) and C. demersum (48.6%) (Shaltout et al, 2009), the leaves of P. australis (41.58%, Al-Sodany et al, 2012), and the shoots (51.5%) of L. stolonifera (Galal et al, 2021b). This study reveals that the TDN of V. cuspidata has suitable contents for sheep (61.7% TDN, NRC 2000) and a mature dry gestating beef cow, which requires 55-60% TDN (Gill & Omokanye, 2016).…”
Section: Nutritive Value Of the Leavesmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated TDN values of V. cuspidata of this study (67.12 -68.16%, Table 3) are higher than the values in the shoots of the two aquatic plants E. crassipes (54.2%) and C. demersum (48.6%) (Shaltout et al, 2009), the leaves of P. australis (41.58%, Al-Sodany et al, 2012), and the shoots (51.5%) of L. stolonifera (Galal et al, 2021b). This study reveals that the TDN of V. cuspidata has suitable contents for sheep (61.7% TDN, NRC 2000) and a mature dry gestating beef cow, which requires 55-60% TDN (Gill & Omokanye, 2016).…”
Section: Nutritive Value Of the Leavesmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…It includes different cell wall fractions, which are resistant to the action of digestive enzymes. In the present study, the CF content in summer leaves of V. cuspidata (38.24% DM, Table 2) is higher than that reported in the shoots of some wild species inhabiting the banks of the watercourses in the Nile Delta, such as P. australis (29.9% DM) (El-Kady, 2000), Cynodon dactylon (20.5% DM), Panicum repens (27.3% DM) (Shaltout et al, 2013), and the above-ground shoots and the rhizomes and roots of the aquatic plant L. stolonifera (Galal et al, 2021b). Moreover, the range of CF contents in V. cuspidata leaves was higher than the mean CF content of temperate grasses (20.0%) and legumes (25.3%) (Norton, 1982).…”
Section: Organic and Inorganic Nutrients Of Leavesmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Agricultural drainage, as well as home and industrial effluents from anthropogenic activities, are the primary causes of pollution in eutrophic water bodies, according to Galal et al [41]. In the same vein, polluted areas in the current study are surrounded by huge amounts of agricultural fields, which could dramatically raise the levels of water nutrients, particularly N and P, and, hence, enhance eutrophication [42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%