2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient requirements of South American camelids: A factorial approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
1
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
44
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Preference by camelids for grasses with high fiber levels is expected due to both a greater efficiency to ferment dietary fiber (Van Saun, 2006), and a longer retention time that allows these animals a greater degradation of ingested feed material compared to other ruminants (Genin and Tichit, 1997;Lopez et al, 1998;San Martín et al, 1986;San Martín, 1991). Moreover, the digestive advantage of camelids over other ruminants (cattle and sheep) is most obvious when comparing the digestion of poor quality or low protein forages (Genin and Tichit, 1997;Lopez et al, 1998;San Martín and Bryant, 1989;San Martín, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preference by camelids for grasses with high fiber levels is expected due to both a greater efficiency to ferment dietary fiber (Van Saun, 2006), and a longer retention time that allows these animals a greater degradation of ingested feed material compared to other ruminants (Genin and Tichit, 1997;Lopez et al, 1998;San Martín et al, 1986;San Martín, 1991). Moreover, the digestive advantage of camelids over other ruminants (cattle and sheep) is most obvious when comparing the digestion of poor quality or low protein forages (Genin and Tichit, 1997;Lopez et al, 1998;San Martín and Bryant, 1989;San Martín, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distal to the forestomach, ingesta particle size is lower in ruminants than in other mammals of comparable size ( Figure 1). It is tempting to speculate that a basic difference in the sorting mechanism between camelids (with the little-understood retention of large particles in the third forestomach compartment, Lechner-Doll and von Engelhardt, 1989) and ruminants prevents the former from achieving the high food intakes, metabolic rates (Van Saun, 2006;Maloiy et al, 2009), species diversity and geographic distribution of the ruminants. Until the particle flow in the camelid forestomach is characterised in more detail, this must remain speculative.…”
Section: Foregut and Hindgut Fermentation: Why Ruminants Are Specialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The climate is cool and dry, with broad daily and seasonal temperature ranges (−2 • C to 18 • C in summer, −12 • C to 16 • C in winter), low rainfall (130 mm/yr) occurring only in summer (December-March) and intense frosts. Food availability is extremely limited during the dry season (winter), when forage is too mature and of low quality (San Martín and Bryant, 1989;Van Saun, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%