2014
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2014.915767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient removal by different plants in wetland roof systems treating domestic wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that wetland roofs can treat municipal wastewater streams to such an extent that the treated water fulfils the requirements of regional wastewater treatment standards. Comparisons of potentially suitable typical regional plants revealed that there were indeed differences in the treatment performance and efficiency of nutrient removal for the species investigated [16].…”
Section: Municipal Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was found that wetland roofs can treat municipal wastewater streams to such an extent that the treated water fulfils the requirements of regional wastewater treatment standards. Comparisons of potentially suitable typical regional plants revealed that there were indeed differences in the treatment performance and efficiency of nutrient removal for the species investigated [16].…”
Section: Municipal Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To prevent clogging and blockages within the wetland roof and pump, gravel is often employed at each end of the wetland roof construction [16]. Additionally, a free hanging metal strainer with small perforations can be integrated onto the suction side of a sump pump to prevent blockages from coarse particles and suction of rooftop sediments [12].…”
Section: Substrata Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[16,17] This inhibition results in variations in the TN incorporated, ranging from 0.3 to 4.2 kg TN ha ¡1 ¢d ¡1 . [17][18][19] In this sense, seasonality has a proven effect on nitrogen uptake by plants. [20,21] Lee et al [22] reported an increase in biomass coverage from 171.0 m 2 in mid-spring (» 12.0-20.0 C) to 296.4 m 2 in summer (» 23.0-26.0 C).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%