1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf00992871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient losses in runoff from grassland and shrubland habitats in Southern New Mexico: I. rainfall simulation experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
173
2
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
19
173
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, results showed that woody-dominated sites exhibited an accentuated hydrological response to rainfall leading to greater event organic C losses. Results agree with previous research in dryland environments that have found rainfall-runoff coefficients [Schlesinger et al, 2000], event discharge, and erosion rates to be notably higher from woody compared to grassland environments [Parsons et al, 1996;Wainwright et al, 2000]. Previous monitoring [Turnbull et al, 2010a] over the grass-creosote shrubland ecotone in the basin at the SNWR found higher runoff coefficients on the creosote shrubland site (0.28) compared to the grama grassland site (0.15 for events monitored) and C losses by fluvial erosion to be 6 times higher from creosote-dominated sites .…”
Section: Change In Soil C Dynamics Over Vegetation Transitionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Furthermore, results showed that woody-dominated sites exhibited an accentuated hydrological response to rainfall leading to greater event organic C losses. Results agree with previous research in dryland environments that have found rainfall-runoff coefficients [Schlesinger et al, 2000], event discharge, and erosion rates to be notably higher from woody compared to grassland environments [Parsons et al, 1996;Wainwright et al, 2000]. Previous monitoring [Turnbull et al, 2010a] over the grass-creosote shrubland ecotone in the basin at the SNWR found higher runoff coefficients on the creosote shrubland site (0.28) compared to the grama grassland site (0.15 for events monitored) and C losses by fluvial erosion to be 6 times higher from creosote-dominated sites .…”
Section: Change In Soil C Dynamics Over Vegetation Transitionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In semi-arid ecosystems, it is already well-established that hydrology exerts a 28 profound influence over other abiotic components of the landscape, primarily erosion 29 (Wainwright et al, 2000), and the loss or redistribution of key plant-limiting nutrients 30 such as nitrogen (Parsons et al, 2003;Schlesinger et al, 1999;Schlesinger et al, 31 2000). It is therefore argued that semi-arid ecohydrology warrants consideration of 32 ecological processes and the suite of hydrology-driven abiotic processes over space 33 stated that "the biotic pattern of vegetation serves to redistribute key abiotic resources 3 such as energy, water and nutrients in important ways that are critical to the dynamics 4 of the community through space and time".…”
Section: Processes 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With runoff plots being constructed on sloping ground, runoff is harvested downslope. Runoff plots were reported from the Negev Desert (Kidron and Yair, 1997;Kidron et al, 2003;Tadmor and Shanan, 1969;Yair and Lavee, 1985), the southwestern US deserts Schlesinger et al, 2000), the Tabernas Desert (Cantón et al, 2002;Rodríguez-Caballero et al, 2012), and the northwestern deserts of China (Li, 2003). In all these examples, the amount of water reaching the footslope or the bottom part of the plot was measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%