Nutrient losses in field-scale surface runoff from claypan soil receiving turkey litter and fertilizer

Sweeney, Daniel W.; Pierzynski, Gary M.; Barnes, Philip L.

doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.008

Cited by 26 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These results are in agreement with the observations of Yu et al (2006), who highlighted that P transfer via surface runoff is affected by the fertilization rate, by the quantity of labile P in the soil, and by topography, temperature, soil use, and rainfall (intensity and duration). Sweeney et al (2012), for their part, observed correlation between the transfer of available P via surface runoff and the available P contents in the soil, which may also be one of the important factors in this study since the available P contents in soils with application of PS and PL were greater in comparison to the other treatments (Table 2). …”

Section: P Transfer Via Surface Runoffmentioning

confidence: 93%

Available content, surface runoff and leaching of phosphorus forms in a typic hapludalf treated with organic and mineral nutrient sources

Lourenzi

Ceretta

Cerini

et al. 2014

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The application of animal manure to soil can increase phosphorus availability to plants and enhance transfer of the nutrient solution drained from the soil surface or leached into the soil profile. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of successive applications of organic and mineral nutrient sources on the available content, surface runoff and leaching of P forms in a Typic Hapludalf in no-tillage systems. Experiment 1 was set up in 2004 in the experimental area of UFSM, in Santa Maria (RS, Brazil). The treatments consisted of: control (without nutrient application) and application of pig slurry (PS), pig deep-litter (PL), cattle slurry (CS), and mineral fertilizers (NPK). The rates were determined to meet the N crop requirements of no-tillage black oat and maize, grown in the 2010/2011 growing season. The soil solution was collected after each event (rain + runoff or leaching) and the soluble, particulate and total P contents were measured. In November 2008, soil was collected in 2 cm intervals to a depth of 20 cm, in 5 cm intervals to a depth of 40 cm, and in 10 cm intervals to a depth of 70 cm. The soil was dried and ground, and P determined after extraction by anion exchange resin (AER). In experiment 2, samples collected from the Typic Hapludalf near experiment 1 were incubated for 20, 35, 58, 73 and 123 days after applying the following treatments: soil, soil + PS, soil + PL, soil + CS and soil + NPK. Thereafter, the soil was sampled and P was analyzed by AER. The applications of nutrient sources over the years led to an increase in available P and its migration in the soil profile. This led to P transfer via surface runoff and leaching, with the largest transfer being observed in PS and PL treatments, in which most P was applied. The soil available P and P transfer via surface runoff were correlated with the amounts applied, regardless of the P source. However, P transfer by leaching was not correlated with the applied nutrient amount, but rather with the solution amount leached in the soil profile.

show abstract

Section: P Transfer Via Surface Runoffmentioning

confidence: 93%

Available content, surface runoff and leaching of phosphorus forms in a typic hapludalf treated with organic and mineral nutrient sources

Lourenzi

Ceretta

Cerini

et al. 2014

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hence, excessive or successive fertilizations with swine waste can cause alterations in soil chemical attributes (Scherer et al, 2010;Lourenzi et al, 2013) and lead to undesirable environmental impacts, such as pollution of surface and subsurface waters (Carneiro et al, 2012;Sørensen & RubAEk, 2012;Sweeney et al, 2012). Table 3 shows the results of maize grain yield as a function of the fertilizations (doses of swine waste and mineral fertilization -NPK).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maize yield after long-term application of pig slurry

Menezes

Silva

Caetano

et al. 2017

Rev. bras. eng. agríc. ambient.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organic wastes produced in large quantities in pig farms, such as liquid swine manure (LSM), can become a good alternative source of nutrients for agriculture, thus enabling total or partial replacement of mineral fertilizers in agricultural crops. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of LSM as a substitute of mineral fertilizer in the maize crop under Cerrado soil conditions. The treatments consisted of using mineral fertilization recommended for the maize crop; without fertilization; and LSM doses (25, 50,100 and 200 m3 ha-1). Maize grain yield was evaluated in the 2004/2005, 2005/2006, 2006/2007, 2007/2008, 2009/2010, 2011/2012 and 2013/2014 crop seasons. The mineral fertilization in maize can be replaced by pig slurry doses from 100 m3 ha-1 in a Cerrado soil (dystroferric Red Latosol with clayey texture) with no loss of yield components.

show abstract

“…In the areas treated with swine effluent applications, the risk of runoff is variable and depends on several factors, such as the rate and frequency of swine effluent applications, soil nutrient concentrations, amount and frequency of rainfall, type of cropping system, slope, soil texture, soil depth, effective field capacity, drainage class, as well as other less important factors, addressed by several authors in numerous studies about P in the world (Yu et al 2006;Meng et al 2008;Flores et al 2012;Sweeney et al 2012;Wu et al 2012;Wang et al 2013). The combination of these factors makes an area more or less susceptible to solution and nutrient transfer in runoff, being very important for the assessment of environmental contamination risks in areas fertilized with swine manure.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Haygarth and Sharpley (2000), soluble or dissolved P is the solution filtered through <0.45 μm, and particulate P is the difference between total P in the unfiltered sample and soluble P (filtered through <0.45 μM). The transfer of P and sediment in surface runoff from cultivated soils are major sources of potential contamination of surface waters adjacent to croplands (Jiao et al 2011;Hart and Cornish 2012;Sweeney et al 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forms of phosphorus transfer in runoff under no-tillage in a soil treated with successive swine effluents applications

Lourenzi

Ceretta

Tiecher

et al. 2015

Environ Monit Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Successive swine effluent applications can substantially increase the transfer of phosphorus (P) forms in runoff. The aim of this study was to evaluate P accumulation in the soil and transfer of P forms in surface runoff from a Hapludalf soil under no-tillage subjected to successive swine effluent applications. This research was carried out in the Agricultural Engineering Department of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil, from 2004 to 2007, on a Typic Hapludalf soil. Swine effluent rates of 0, 20, 40, and 80 m3 ha(-1) were broadcast over the soil surface prior to sowing of different species in a crop rotation. Soil samples were collected in stratified layers, and the levels of available P were determined. Samples of water runoff from the soil surface were collected throughout the period, and the available, soluble, particulate, and total P were measured. Successive swine effluent applications led to increases in P availability, especially in the soil surface, and P migration through the soil profile. Transfer of P forms was closely associated with runoff, which is directly related to rainfall volume. Swine effluent applications also reduced surface runoff. These results show that in areas with successive swine effluent applications, practices that promote higher water infiltration into the soil are required, e.g., crop rotation and no-tillage system.

show abstract

Nutrient losses in field-scale surface runoff from claypan soil receiving turkey litter and fertilizer

Cited by 26 publications

References 21 publications

Available content, surface runoff and leaching of phosphorus forms in a typic hapludalf treated with organic and mineral nutrient sources

Available content, surface runoff and leaching of phosphorus forms in a typic hapludalf treated with organic and mineral nutrient sources

Maize yield after long-term application of pig slurry

Forms of phosphorus transfer in runoff under no-tillage in a soil treated with successive swine effluents applications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About