2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient Loading through Submarine Groundwater Discharge and Phytoplankton Growth in Monterey Bay, CA

Abstract: ABSTRACT:We quantified groundwater discharge and associated nutrient fluxes to Monterey Bay, California, during the wet and dry seasons using excess 224 Ra as a tracer. Bioassay incubation experiments were conducted to document the response of bloom-forming phytoplankton to submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) input. Our data indicate that the high nutrient content (nitrate and silica) in groundwater can stimulate the growth of bloom-forming phytoplankton. The elevated concentrations of nitrate in groundwate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(84 reference statements)
7
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source of silicate to the coastal aquifer was determined to be dissolution of aquifer substrate while the sources of nitrate and phosphate were undetermined [29]. SGD flux from the coastal aquifer was determined to be an important source of nutrients to the coastal waters throughout the year, but especially during the late summer/early fall (dry season) when other sources of nutrients to the bay, river discharge and upwelling, were limited [6,29]. SGD fluxes were similar year-round and modulated by tides and wave ramp-up [6,29].…”
Section: Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The source of silicate to the coastal aquifer was determined to be dissolution of aquifer substrate while the sources of nitrate and phosphate were undetermined [29]. SGD flux from the coastal aquifer was determined to be an important source of nutrients to the coastal waters throughout the year, but especially during the late summer/early fall (dry season) when other sources of nutrients to the bay, river discharge and upwelling, were limited [6,29]. SGD fluxes were similar year-round and modulated by tides and wave ramp-up [6,29].…”
Section: Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best estimates suggest that SGD water input to the ocean is equivalent to 60-400% of riverine water flux [1,4]. Nutrients transported to the ocean through SGD have been shown to affect marine biota, specifically the abundance and productivity of phytoplankton, macro-algae, and seagrasses, which have implications for organisms in higher trophic levels [5][6][7][8][9]. SGD is comprised of fresh groundwater, seawater that has circulated through the coastal aquifer, or a mixture of both water types [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, recent studies on the California coast show a significant input of nitrogen from wastewater effluent, riverine runoff, submarine groundwater discharge, and atmospheric deposition (Reifel et al, 2013;Howard et al, 2014;Lecher et al, 2015). Compared to the input from upwelling, these nutrient sources are smaller by at least an order of magnitude at system or regional scales.…”
Section: Seeding and Nutrition Of Habsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lecher et al, 2015;Rodellas et al, 2014), although very little work has been done on this topic to date in the UK. For marine receptors the ecological sensitivity is likely to be well below 1 mg/L.…”
Section: Context and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%