2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient loading on subsoils from on-site wastewater effluent, comparing septic tank and secondary treatment systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A more detailed description of this procedure is provided in Gill et al (2009). After dilution factors were calculated at each depth plane a simple mass balance approach was adopted to estimate the zone of contribution of effective rainfall at each depth plane, the dimensions of which are shown on Table 5.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more detailed description of this procedure is provided in Gill et al (2009). After dilution factors were calculated at each depth plane a simple mass balance approach was adopted to estimate the zone of contribution of effective rainfall at each depth plane, the dimensions of which are shown on Table 5.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systems were designed (area and depth) based upon a modeled water balance between the typical wastewater effluent rates expected from the dwelling, the local rainfall and the estimated evapotranspiration from the basin over a four year period. Realistic time-varying fluctuations in flows (from basis of previous research carried out by Gill et al [15]), local meteorological conditions and estimated crop coefficients were input into the water balance model which then simulated willow evapotranspiration across a four year period. The crop coefficients were assumed to be 1 throughout the winter months, increasing up to maximum values of 2.65 across the summer months.…”
Section: Construction Of Full-scale Et Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Gill et al (2007Gill et al ( , 2009 observed that secondary treated effluent inputs to the percolation field can paradoxically lead to regions of higher contaminant concentration at depth in the soil than septic tank effluent inputs of higher contaminant content. They argued that the lower organic concentrations of the secondary treated inputs lead to a thinner, more permeable biomat, resulting in localization of wastewater flow in a shorter region at the upstream end of the percolation trench.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gill et al (2009) suggested that reduced attenuation in freely draining soils may be due to a muted spread of biomat and a resulting concentration of hydraulic loading in the upstream region of the trench. Biomat in moderately percolating soils results in distribution of the flow over a greater area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%